Abstract
Aims
The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and responsiveness to hip surgery of a four-point modified Care and Comfort Hypertonicity Questionnaire (mCCHQ) scoring tool in children with cerebral palsy (CP) in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV and V.
Methods
This was a population-based cohort study in children with CP from a national surveillance programme. Reliability was assessed from 20 caregivers who completed the mCCHQ questionnaire on two occasions three weeks apart. Test-retest reliability of the mCCHQ was calculated, and responsiveness before and after surgery for a displaced hip was evaluated in a cohort of children.
Results
Test-retest reliability for the overall mCCHQ score was good (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78), and no dimension demonstrated poor reliability. The surgical intervention cohort comprised ten children who had preoperative and postoperative mCCHQ scores at a minimum of six months postoperatively. The mCCHQ tool demonstrated a significant improvement in overall score from preoperative assessment to six-month postoperative follow-up assessment (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The mCCHQ demonstrated responsiveness to intervention and good test-retest reliability. The mCCHQ is proposed as an outcome tool for use within a national surveillance programme for children with CP.
Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):580–583.
Take home message
The four-point modified Care and Comfort Hypertonicity Questionnaire (mCCHQ) score is a valid outcome assessment tool which shows responsiveness to intervention and good test-retest reliability.
The mCCHQ is proposed as validated outcome measure for use within a national surveillance programme for children with cerebral palsy.
Introduction
Hip displacement is one of the major disability-related health issues in nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) and is more likely to be seen in children in higher Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels.1-4 National surveillance programmes for children with CP have been shown to reduce the incidence of hip displacement by enabling timely management of hips at risk.5,6 It is important, as part of continued surveillance of children with hip displacement, to attempt to identify the extent of the clinical consequences of hip displacement such as hip pain, seating difficulties, and perineal nursing care before and after an intervention to relocate a displaced or dislocated hip. This is a challenge, as the children most commonly affected are in GMFCS levels IV and V and often unable to express their difficulties themselves. Therefore, clinicians rely on proxy reporting by the child’s carer(s).
The Cerebral Palsy Integrated Pathway Scotland (CPIPS) surveillance programme currently employs a four-point modified version of the traditional Care and Comfort Hypertonicity Questionnaire (CCHQ), introduced in 2006 by McCoy et al.7 The CCHQ in itself is a development of the original Caregiver Questionnaire,8 which was developed in 1990 to measure the perceived effort of caregivers in providing care for children with moderate to severe CP.9 The aim of the CCHQ was to evaluate functional needs and, to a lesser extent, quality of life in children with CP.7 The CCHQ is a self-reported 27-item questionnaire and the four domains covered are personal care, positioning/transferring, comfort, and interaction/communication. Although the CCHQ is rated through a seven-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (very easy) to 7 (impossible), our modified CCHQ (mCCHQ) is rated on a four-point scale. The modified Likert scale of the mCCHQ ranges from 1 (very easy) to 4 (impossible), giving a maximum possible score of 108 (Supplementary Material).
Content validity of the CCHQ has been established, as well as its ability to detect change when intrathecal baclofen was administered or the dose levels changed,10 but this has not been evaluated before and after a hip reconstruction. Furthermore, inter- and intrarater reliability and concurrent validity of the CCHQ are yet to be determined.7 The CCHQ seemed to offer potential advantages over more lengthy questionnaires and those that assumed that the respondent would be the child themself.
We decided to evaluate intra- and inter-rater reliability, and responsiveness to surgical intervention, of our four-point mCCHQ questionnaire to assess hip pain, overall function and the outcome of hip surgery for children with CP in the CPIPS surveillance programme.
Methods
This study was reviewed by the South East Scotland Research Ethics Service and was deemed not to require ethical approval under the terms of the Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees. This was a population-based cohort study in children with CP from the CPIPS surveillance programme, initiated in 2013.11 Over 95% of all children with CP are registered in the programme, and one of its main aims is to monitor hip displacement and dislocation.11 Informed consent for use of data is gained for each patient as they are enrolled on to the CPIPS programme.
Assessment of reliability of mCCHQ score
To evaluate the test-retest reliability of the mCCHQ, 20 caregivers participating in the CPIPS programme were invited to complete the mCCHQ questionnaire on two occasions three weeks apart.
Assessment of responsiveness to change
To assess responsiveness of the mCCHQ to hip intervention, the CPIPS database of 2,403 children with CP in Scotland was interrogated to identify patients in GMFCS levels IV and V who had undergone surgery for hip displacement or dislocation between 2018 and 2021, and who had a preoperative score and postoperative score collected at a minimum of six months following their hip surgery. Data on the classification of CP12 and GMFCS levels of the children were retrieved from the CPIPS database.
Statistical analysis
Test-retest reliability examined the relation between repeated evaluations of the mCCHQ score. The standard deviations (SDs) of the differences between the initial and three-week mCCHQ scores for individual domains and the total score were calculated to summarize the absolute differences obtained on repeat testing. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (two-way random effects model with absolute agreement) were applied to determine the test-retest reliability of the day 0 mCCHQ scores compared with the three-week mCCHQ scores. Scores for ICC coefficient range from 0 to 1, where the former shows no reliability, and the latter exhibits perfect reliability. Cicchetti and Sparrow13 and Fleiss et al14 have suggested that a score of < 0.40 is poor, 0.40 to 0.59 is fair, 0.60 to 0.74 is good, and > 0.74 is excellent.
Significance of responsiveness to change between preoperative score and minimum six-month follow-up was assessed using the paired t-test. A significance level < 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant. In this part of the study, we deemed it important clinically to evaluate the average total score per dimension, rather than mean score of individual questions. This was to determine which dimensions of the mCCHQ were more or less affected by the intervention, and where the statistical significance lay within the dimensions, as well as whether there was a significant change in the overall score. “Not applicable” (N/A) responses are available in the database.
Results
All questionnaires were completed by carers of the children without supervision from clinical staff, suggesting that the questionnaire was easy to complete. A total of 20 carers completed the mCCHQ questionnaire on the first occasion, and 19 completed this three weeks later. Of the patients, 16 were GMFCS level V and four were level IV. Mean and median scores per question for each dimension of the mCCHQ for the first timepoint are given in Table I.
Table I.
Dimension | mCCHQ score per question | |
---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) | |
1: Personal care | 2.44 (0.41) | 2.47 (2.06 to 2.79) |
2: Positioning/transferring | 2.17 (0.58) | 2.08 (1.83 to 2.40) |
3: Comfort | 2.04 (0.73) | 1.90 (1.40 to 2.48) |
4: Interaction/communication | 2.28 (0.48) | 2.29 (2.00 to 2.71) |
Total | 2.23 (0.38) | 2.17 (1.96 to 2.54) |
-
IQR, interquartile range; mCCHQ, modified Care and Comfort Hypertonicity Questionnaire; SD, standard deviation.
Test-retest reliability of the mCCHQ score
Test-retest reliability was calculated for the mCCHQ score between day 0 and three-week test occasions. During this time period, there was no interval change in health status as ascertained by clinical assessment with a complete review of systems. ICCs demonstrated the highest interobserver reliability for personal care (ICC 0.76), followed by comfort (ICC 0.71), positioning/transferring (ICC 0.67), and was lowest for interaction/communication (ICC 0.54) of the mCCHQ. Test-retest reliability for the overall mCCHQ score was good (ICC 0.78). The SD of differences for the overall mean score per question between initial mCCHQ and three-week mCCHQ was 0.24, with no difference in any dimension being greater than 0.48. Therefore, on retesting we can be 95% confident that the difference in overall score per question will be less than 0.5. No score was deemed to have poor reliability, with all scores being at least moderately reliable or better. Any questions that were “N/A” preoperatively were also “N/A” postoperatively in the same patient.
Responsiveness of mCCHQ to hip intervention
The surgical intervention cohort comprised ten children with a mean age of 8.6 years (4 to 13) who had both pre- and postoperative mCCHQ scores at a minimum of six months postoperatively (mean follow-up 14.6 months (SD 3.8)). There were seven patients whon were GMFCS level V and three who were level IV. Eight patients had a combined Dega pelvic osteotomy and proximal femoral varus derotation osteotomy (of which six were bilateral) and two had proximal femoral varus derotation osteotomies alone (both left-sided). In all cases, any questions that were “N/A” preoperatively were also “N/A” postoperatively.
The mean preoperative and six-month postoperative mCCHQ scores for the cohort are shown in Table II. There was a significant improvement in the domains of personal care, positioning/transferring, and overall mCCHQ score from preoperative assessment to six-month postoperative follow-up assessment (p < 0.001).
Table II.
Dimension | Preoperative mean score (SD) | Minimum six-month mean score (SD) | Mean difference (SEM) | p-value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
1: Personal care | 18.4 (6.22) | 15.5 (5.44) | 2.90 (1.48) | 0.041 |
2: Positioning/transferring | 16.0 (3.92) | 11.3 (3.86) | 4.7 (1.37) | 0.007 |
3: Comfort | 10.2 (5.63) | 9.30 (4.81) | 0.90 (1.32) | 0.513 |
4: Interaction/communication | 16.2 (2.39) | 14.6 (3.06) | 1.60 (0.79) | 0.074 |
Overall Score | 60.8 (14.2) | 50.7 (12.5) | 10.1 (1.72) | < 0.001 |
-
*
Paired t-test.
-
mCCHQ, modified Care and Comfort Hypertonicity Questionnaire; SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Discussion
The most important finding of this preliminary study was that the mCCHQ score was a reliable, responsive tool that could be used to evaluate the effect of surgery in managing a displaced or dislocated hip in CP children who were GMFCS levels IV and V.
The mCCHQ score is a health-related quality of life measure that includes items of clinical relevance to hip displacement, and therefore should reflect the effects of hip interventions on quality of life accurately. This study shows that all dimensions in the mCCHQ were reduced by hip intervention, suggesting an improvement in quality of life. The overall change in score was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The comfort dimension did not reach statistical significance, which is of interest as pain is often cited by clinicians as the main reason for hip surgery in this patient group. The authors feel this may be due to the relatively low numbers in the intervention group, as discussed below. There was one question (occasionally two) that carers determined “N/A” within the intervention group, but the same questions remained “N/A” after intervention and were thus not relevant to the hip surgery.
There were limitations to this study. The number of respondents could have been greater, but we felt that 20 respondents would suffice for test-retest reliability of the mCCHQ. We had also anticipated identifying more children from the CPIPS database who had mCCHQ scores at least six months after reconstructive surgery. We concluded that the small number was because surgical services were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and continued to be so after the relaxation of restrictions, with the recovery of clinical services from this period continuing up to the time of writing. Future studies on responsiveness of the score to intervention will contain greater numbers. These should give more detailed information on the effect of hip intervention on the domains, and perhaps even allow assessment of the individual questions.
There are a number of other recognized quality of life measures for children with CP, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. The CPCHILD15 and CP QOL-Child16 measures have been considered to have a high quality of construction, face validity, and concurrent validity. However, their sensitivity to change has not previously been reported.17 The PEDSQL 3.0 measure has data on sensitivity, but has a disproportionate focus on function rather than quality of life which, although linked, does not always correlate.18 A balanced valid score for use in a children’s CP national registry is required to be acceptable to stakeholders, responsive to intervention, have good utility, sufficient content, and concurrent validity, and show acceptable test-retest reliability.
Our conclusions are that the mCCHQ is responsive to hip interventions and has good test-retest reliability. The mCCHQ is thus proposed as an outcome tool for use in GMFCS levels IV and V within the setting of a national surveillance programme for children with CP.
References
1. Palisano R , Rosenbaum P , Walter S , Russell D , Wood E , Galuppi B . Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy . Dev Med Child Neurol . 1997 ; 39 ( 4 ): 214 – 223 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
2. Soo B , Howard JJ , Boyd RN , et al. Hip displacement in cerebral palsy . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2006 ; 88-A ( 1 ): 121 – 129 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
3. Larnert P , Risto O , Hägglund G , Wagner P . Hip displacement in relation to age and gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy . J Child Orthop . 2014 ; 8 ( 2 ): 129 – 134 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
4. Edwards TA , Thompson N , Prescott RJ , Stebbins J , Wright JG , Theologis T . A comparison of conventional and minimally invasive multilevel surgery for children with diplegic cerebral palsy . Bone Joint J . 2021 ; 103-B ( 1 ): 192 – 197 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
5. Hägglund G , Andersson S , Düppe H , Lauge-Pedersen H , Nordmark E , Westbom L . Prevention of dislocation of the hip in children with cerebral palsy. The first ten years of a population-based prevention programme . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2005 ; 87-B ( 1 ): 95 – 101 . PubMed Google Scholar
6. Wordie SJ , Robb JE , Hägglund G , Bugler KE , Gaston MS . Hip displacement and dislocation in a total population of children with cerebral palsy in Scotland . Bone Joint J . 2020 ; 102-B ( 3 ): 383 – 387 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
7. Nemer McCoy R , Blasco PA , Russman BS , O’Malley JP . Validation of a care and comfort hypertonicity questionnaire . Dev Med Child Neurol . 2006 ; 48 ( 3 ): 181 – 187 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
8. Baker KW , Tann B , Mutlu A , Gaebler-Spira D . Improvements in children with cerebral palsy following intrathecal baclofen: use of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Care and Comfort Caregiver Questionnaire (RIC CareQ) . J Child Neurol . 2014 ; 29 ( 3 ): 312 – 317 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9. Hwang M , Kuroda MM , Tann B , Gaebler-Spira DJ . Measuring care and comfort in children with cerebral palsy: the Care and Comfort Caregiver Questionnaire . PM R . 2011 ; 3 ( 10 ): 912 – 919 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
10. Stewart K , Hutana G , Kentish M . Intrathecal baclofen therapy in paediatrics: a study protocol for an Australian multicentre, 10-year prospective audit . BMJ Open . 2017 ; 7 ( 6 ). Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
11. Bugler KE , Gaston MS , Robb JE . Hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy in Scotland: a total population study . J Child Orthop . 2018 ; 12 ( 6 ): 635 – 639 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
12. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe . Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) . Dev Med Child Neurol . 2000 ; 42 ( 12 ): 816 – 824 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
13. Cicchetti DV , Sparrow SA . Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior . Am J Ment Defic . 1981 ; 86 ( 2 ): 127 – 137 . PubMed Google Scholar
14. Fleiss JL , Levin B , Paik MC . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions . 1st Edition . London, UK : John Wiley & Sons , 2003 . Crossref Google Scholar
15. Narayanan UG , Fehlings D , Weir S , Knights S , Kiran S , Campbell K . Initial development and validation of the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) . Dev Med Child Neurol . 2006 ; 48 ( 10 ): 804 – 812 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
16. Waters E , Davis E , Mackinnon A , et al. Psychometric properties of the quality of life questionnaire for children with CP . Dev Med Child Neurol . 2007 ; 49 ( 1 ): 49 – 55 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
17. Carlon S , Shields N , Yong K , Gilmore R , Sakzewski L , Boyd R . A systematic review of the psychometric properties of quality of life measures for school aged children with cerebral palsy . BMC Pediatr . 2010 ; 10 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
18. Livingston MH , Rosenbaum PL , Russell DJ , Palisano RJ . Quality of life among adolescents with cerebral palsy: what does the literature tell us? Dev Med Child Neurol . 2007 ; 49 ( 3 ): 225 – 231 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
Author contributions
N. S. Makaram: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
R. J. Prescott: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
P. Alexander: Data curation, Writing – review & editing.
J. E. Robb: Conceptualization, Supervision, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
M. S. Gaston: Conceptualization, Supervision, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding statement
The authors disclose receipt of the following financial or material support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this work was supported by a small grant from CPIPS which funded the open access publication fee for this study.
Data sharing
The data that support the findings for this study are available to other researchers from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethical review statement
Following review by the South East Scotland Research Ethics Service, ethical approval for this study was not required under the terms of the Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees.
Open access funding
The open access funding for publication of this article was provided by CPIPS.
Follow N. S. Makaram @makortho
Supplementary material
The modified Care and Comfort Hypertonicity questionnaire (mCCHQ) currently administered as part of the Cerebral Palsy Integrated Pathway Scotland programme.
© 2023 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/