Abstract
Aim
Debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is a valuable option for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), provided that the criteria of the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines are fulfilled. The inflammation caused by infection and the surgical impact of DAIR may influence implant stability. In this study, we investigated the sequelae of DAIR on implant survival after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Method
THAs from our database implanted between 1984 and 2016 were included in a retrospective double-cohort study. THAs were exposed (DAIR cohort) or not exposed to DAIR (control cohort). The control cohort comprised patients matched 3:1 to the DAIR cohort. The outcome—implant failure over time—was evaluated for (i) revision for any reason, (ii) aseptic loosening of any component, and (iii) radiographic evidence of loosening.
Results
Fifty-seven THAs (56 patients) were included in the DAIR cohort and 170 THAs (168 patients) in the control cohort. The mean follow-up periods in the DAIR and control cohorts were 6.1 (SD 4.7) and 7.8 (SD 5.5) years, respectively. During follow-up, 20 (36%) patients in the DAIR cohort and 54 (32%) in the control cohort died after a mean of 4.1 (SD 4.7) and 7.2 (SD 5.4) years, respectively. Revision for any reason was performed in 9 (16%) DAIR THAs and 10 (6%) control THAs (p = 0.03) and for aseptic loosening of any component in 5 (9%) DAIR THAs and 8 (5%, p = 0.32) control THAs, respectively. Radiological analysis included 56 DAIR THAs and 168 control THAs. Two (4%) stems and 2 (4%) cups in the DAIR cohort and 7 (4%) and 1 (0.6%) in the control cohort, respectively, demonstrated radiological signs of failure (p = 1).
Conclusions
THAs exposed to DAIR were revised for any reason more frequently than were THAs in the control cohort. The difference in revisions for aseptic loosening was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in radiographic evidence of loosening of any component between cohorts.
