header advert
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Full Access


The effects of hyaluronic acid on articular chondrocytes

Download PDF


The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of hyaluronic acid supplementation on chondrocyte metabolism in vitro. The clinical benefits of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections are thought to occur through improved joint lubrication. Recent findings have shown that exogenous hyaluronic acid is incorporated into articular cartilage where it may have a direct biological effect on chondrocytes through CD44 receptors.

Bovine articular chondrocytes were isolated and seeded into alginate constructs. These were cultured in medium containing hyaluronic acid at varying concentrations. Samples were assayed for biochemical and histological changes.

There was a dose-dependent response to the exposure of hyaluronic acid to bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro. Low concentrations of hyaluronic acid (0.1 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL) significantly increase DNA, sulphated glycosaminoglycan and hydroxyproline synthesis. Immunohistology confirmed the maintenance of cell phenotype with increased matrix deposition of chondroitin-6-sulphate and collagen type II. These findings confirm a stimulatory effect of hyaluronic acid on chondrocyte metabolism.

Therapeutic efforts to treat osteoarthritis are usually directed towards providing symptomatic relief and delaying the need for total joint arthroplasty. Recently, treatments such as glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate supplementation, intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid,13 subchondral drilling, mosaic-plasty, tissue engineered focal defect repair and autologous chondrocyte implantation are examples of a shift in emphasis from simple analgesia to preventative approaches.

Synovial fluid from osteoarthritic joints has a much lower elasticity and viscosity than that from normal joints.46 This decrease in the rheological properties of synovial fluid results from both a reduced molecular size and a reduced concentration of hyaluronic acid in the synovial fluid.7 Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid, or its derivatives, are used in an attempt to return the elasticity and viscosity of the synovial fluid to normal.8

Clinical studies have shown that hyaluronic acid injections are well tolerated and provide sustained relief from pain and functional disability.913

The physical properties of hyaluronic acid are important but there is evidence to suggest that hyaluronic acid may provide both physiochemical and pharmacological advantages. Chondrocytes express the glycoprotein CD44 on their cell surface; this has the capacity to function as a hyaluronic acid receptor and so may be involved in biochemical interactions with chondrocytes.14,15 The effects of hyaluronic acid injections may be mediated via CD44 interactions. Exogenous hyaluronic acid is known to be incorporated into cartilage.16

The purpose of this study was to determine the in vitro effects of hyaluronic acid supplementation on articular chondrocyte activity and their ability to synthesise essential components of the articular cartilage extracellular matrix. The effects of hyaluronic acid on chondrocyte proliferation, measured by DNA production, sulphated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis, collagen type II synthesis and maintenance of phenotype was determined. This study also evaluated the possibility of supplementing hydrogels with hyaluronic acid to improve the quality of the gel/chondrocyte constructs for the purpose of tissue-engineered repair of focal articular cartilage defects.

Materials and Methods

Bovine articular chondrocytes were cultured on alginate beads containing various concentrations of hyaluronic acid for a period of 14 days with a regular change of hyaluronic acid-containing medium. DNA, sulphated GAG and collagen synthesis in the culture specimens were quantified using well-established assaying techniques. Chondrocyte proliferation and extra cellular matrix production were determined by histological assessment using haematoxylin and eosin staining. The immunolocalisation of chondrotin-6-sulphate and collagen types I and II was also performed to assess the quality of the extracellular matrix.

Isolation of chondrocytes.

Bovine articular cartilage was harvested from the metacarpophalangeal joints of six 18-month-old calves. The cartilage was obtained aseptically within six hours of slaughter and the entire cartilage from each joint was removed. Extracted articular cartilage slices were placed immediately into Earl’s Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS) (Sigma, Poole, UK). The tissues were finely diced and washed in EBSS. Cells were released from the tissue by sequential enzyme digestion, firstly in 10 mg/mL pronase E (Merck, Poole, UK) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Life Technology, Paisley, UK) + 20% Fetal Calf Serum (FCS) (Life Technology) for one hour, followed by overnight digestion in 0.07 mg/mL collagenase type XI (Sigma) at 37°C on a rolamixer. The supernatant containing released chondrocytes was then filtered through a sterile 70 μm nylon sieve (Falcon, Oxford, UK) to remove undigested cartilage, washed twice in DMEM + 20% FCS and finally resuspended in culture medium (DMEM, supplemented with 20% FCS, 1 m HEPES buffer, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine and 50 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid). The number of cells and their viability was determined by trypan blue staining and a haemacytometer.

Cell culture.

The isolated cells were resuspended in 2% low-viscosity alginate hydrogel (Kelco Neutrosweet, Tadworth, UK) containing Rooster comb hyaluronic acid (Sigma) at a density of 5 x 106 cells/mL. The alginate gels were made to four different concentrations of hyaluronic acid: 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/mL. The control specimens contained alginate that was free from hyaluronic acid.

The alginate/chondrocyte/hyaluronic acid suspensions were then gently expressed through a 22-gauge needle attached to a 5 mL syringe into a 100 mm CaCl2 solution in a sterile Petri dish and each drop polymerised to form an alginate bead containing approximately 100 000 chondrocytes (Syringe droplet technique).17 Twenty minutes of incubation was allowed for further polymerisation. The newly-formed beads were then washed twice in EBSS to remove excess CaCl2. Five sets of beads containing hyaluronic acid at the four different concentrations, and a control set of beads containing chondrocytes without hyaluronic acid, were formed and were used for the culture experiments.

Each set of alginate beads was then transferred into sterile 24-well culture plates, with eight randomly chosen beads placed in each well containing 1 mL of culture medium supplemented with hyaluronic acid at the same concentration as that in the respective alginate beads. The hydrogel constructs were cultured for a period of 14 days in the humidified atmosphere of a standard incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. The culture medium was replaced by fresh culture medium every three days.

Biochemical analysis.

Six replicates of eight alginate beads were removed randomly from each of the five cultures at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 14 days for analysis. In order to release the cells and matrix from alginate, the chondrocyte/alginate beads were dissolved in a buffer containing 55 mm sodium citrate (BDH, Poole, UK), 150 mm sodium chloride (BDH), 5 mm cysteine hydrochloride (Sigma), 5 mm EDTA (BDH) and 0.56 mg/mL of papain (Sigma), at 60°C for 24 hours.

The total DNA was determined using the Hoechst method described by Rao and Otto18 and Rago, Mitchen and Wilding.19 Calf thymus DNA, in a 1:1 solution of saline sodium citrate + 0.4% (v/v) sodium dodecylsulphate and papain digest buffer, was used for preparation of the standard dilution curve ranging from 0 to 20 μg/mL. We added 100 μL aliquots of standards or samples to appropriate wells in a fluorimetric well plate. We also added 100 μL Hoechst 33258 (1 μg/mL) in saline sodium citrate to each well and the plates were read on a fluorimeter (Fluoroskan Ascent, LabSystems, Cheshire, UK) with a 365 nm excitation filter and emission set at 460 nm.

The measurement of total sulphated GAG in the chondrocyte cultures was performed using the 1,9-dimethyl-methylene blue (DMB) dye method, which had been modified for use with alginate systems at a pH of 1.5.2022 Chondroitin sulphate A from shark fin (Sigma) was diluted with distilled water to prepare a standard curve (0 to 100 μg/mL). We added 40 μL of the papain-digested samples or GAG standards to 250 μL of DMB solution in wells of an absorbance plate. GAG content was determined using a spectrophotometer (Biorad Plate-Reader, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hemel Hempstead, UK) at a wavelength of 595 nm.

The measurement of the hydroxyapatite content of the alginate beads was performed using an oxidation assay23 which was run in the Cobas Bio centrifugal analyser (Roche, Rotkruez, Switzerland) at 40°C. The assay involves the oxidation of the amino acid hydroxyproline in the samples by chloramine T. The chromogens formed (pyrrole and pry-2-carboxylic acid) are coupled with p-dimethylamino-benzaldehyde (DMAB) to produce a chromophore whose absorbance can be measured at 570 nm. Standard curves were used to determine the hydroxyproline concentrations in the sample range 0 to 100 μmol L.

Histological analysis.

Specimens were collected on days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 14 for the five alginate bead sets and were fixed at 4°C in buffer consisting of 4% paraformaldehyde (AGAR Scientific Ltd, Stansted, UK), 100 mm sodium cacodylate (AGAR Scientific Ltd) and 10 mm CaC12 (BDH) at pH 7.4 for 24 hours. Samples were then washed overnight at 4°C in 0.1 m sodium cacodylate and 50 mm BaCl2 (Merck) at pH 7.4. The fixed beads were then dehydrated through a series of ethanol concentrations, cleared with xylene and embedded in paraffin wax. Six sections were cut at a thickness of 5 μm, using a sledge microtome, mounted onto glass slides, rehydrated and deparaffinised. The sections were stained with Harris’s acid alum haematoxylin and eosin in order to demonstrate cell nuclei and extracellular matrix. The sections were mounted in a synthetic mounting medium (DPX − dibutylphthalate + xylene) for microscopic examination (Model, BH2, Olympus, UK).

Immunolocalisation for collagen types I and II and GAG chondroitin-6-sulphate.

Immunolocalisation of the chondrocyte-seeded alginate beads for chondroitin-6-sulphate and collagen was performed using the streptavidin biotin-immunoperoxidase method.24 This process was also used for detection of the Ki-67 nuclear antigen. This is a nuclear antigen found only in proliferating cells and gives a reliable indication of the presence of healthy replicating chondrocytes. Paraffin wax sections of the cell/alginate constructs were initially de-waxed in xylene, then soaked in an endogenous peroxidase block consisting of 3% (v/v) H2O2 in methanol for 15 minutes, followed by pre-treatment with a trypsin solution (0.1% (w/v) trypsin (Sigma) and 0.1% (w/v) CaC12 in distilled water) at 37°C for ten minutes. In contrast, the sections to be stained for chondroitin-6-sulphate were pre-treated with chondroitinase ABC (0.125 IU/mL) for 60 minutes. The sections were then blocked with rabbit serum (DakoCytomation Ltd, Cambridgeshire, UK) diluted 1:5 in Tris Buffered Saline (TBS) (0.05 m TBS, 0.15 m sodium chloride, pH 7.6) for 20 minutes.

Subsequently, the sections were incubated with the relevant primary antibody, which consisted of CIICI (DSHB, University of Iowa, Iowa) diluted 1:2 with TBS, Col-1 (Sigma) diluted 1:100 and 3-B-3 (ICN/FLOW) diluted 1:100 to stain for collagen type II, collagen type I and chondroitin-6-sulphate, respectively. The primary antibody was then removed by washing in TBS for five minutes, and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody (Dako) 1:200 in TBS. The sections were then washed and incubated with streptavidan/biotin/horseradish peroxidase complex (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 minutes at room temperature. They were then rinsed and incubated with DAB peroxidase solution (Sigma) for ten minutes. The samples were counterstained with Harris’s haematoxylin for two minutes and mounted with DPX, a mixture of distyrene, tricresyl phosphate and xylene.

Statistical analysis.

Graphs were plotted to represent the mean (sem) of six replicate samples. Two-way analysis of variance was carried out to assess the effects of dose, day and the statistical interaction between these two factors. Post hoc Dunnet’s T3 tests were carried out to assess the difference between each dose and the control (zero) dose. Checks on assumptions of normality and constant variance were also performed. Assumptions of constant variance held for GAG and hydroxyproline data, but did not hold for DNA values. Therefore, analysis was repeated on log-transformed DNA values, but gave essentially similar results. Consequently, analyses on untransformed data have been reported.


Our results showed that articular chondrocytes cultured in the presence of hyaluronic acid have a significantly greater rate of DNA proliferation and extracellular matrix production, compared with chondrocytes cultured without hyaluronic acid. Cell proliferation and matrix synthesis depended upon the concentration of hyaluronic acid present, with the greater cellular responses being seen at lower hyaluronic acid concentrations.


The chondrocytes exposed to 0.1 μg/mL hyaluronic acid showed the greatest levels of DNA proliferation and sulphated GAG and collagen production. Significantly higher levels of DNA and extracellular matrix components were recorded on days 9 and 14 in the cultures exposed to both 0.1 μg/mL and 1.0 μg/mL hyaluronic acid compared with the controls (p = 0.01). As the concentration of hyaluronic acid was increased to 2.0 and 3.0 mg/mL, the level of DNA and extracellular matrix synthesis declined considerably, although it remained higher than in the controls.

DNA analysis.

The DNA content of the control and hyaluronic acid-treated chondrocyte groups is shown in Figure 1 and Table I. An overall increase in DNA content occurred in all study groups during the culture period, which indicated an increase in cell numbers. In all conditions there appeared to be an initial decrease in DNA content during the first three days of culture. At days 9 and 14 there was a statistically significant mean increase in content for cultures exposed to 0.1 and 1.0 mg/mL hyaluronic acid (p = 0.006 for both, compared with zero dose), with the greatest increase occurring with 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid. By day 14 there was a 76% increase in the 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid group compared with a 49% increase in the control group. At an hyaluronic acid concentration of 2.0 mg/mL the increase was more modest (p = 0.027) and with a concentration of 3.0 mg/mL the increase in DNA content was not significant.

Table I.

Mean DNA content (μg/mL) of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid for up to 14 days

Hyaluronic acid concentration
Day Control 0.1 mg/ml 1.0 mg/ml 2.0 mg/ml 3.0 mg/ml
0 2.13 2.20 2.13 2.12 2.14
3 2.04 2.14 2.11 2.09 2.06
6 2.51 2.66 2.62 2.52 2.51
9 3.07 3.96 3.45 3.18 3.11
14 3.19 3.89 3.72 3.38 3.22
Fig. 1  
            Bar chart showing DNA content of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) for up to 14 days (sem bars) (n = 6). * statistically significant difference from the control mean with p <

Fig. 1

Bar chart showing DNA content of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) for up to 14 days (sem bars) (n = 6). * statistically significant difference from the control mean with p < 0.05.

Sulphated GAG analysis.

The GAG content of the control and hyaluronic acid-treated chondrocyte groups is shown in Figure 2 and Table II. Again, a significant interaction was observed between day and dose (p < 0.001); the effect of all doses, particularly at 0.1 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL, was seen more clearly for days 9 and 14 when compared with the earlier timepoints. There was an overall increase in GAG content within the alginate beads in all five cultures. The increase in GAG content was greater in all chondrocyte cultures exposed to hyaluronic acid compared with the control group and there was a dose-dependent response to hyaluronic acid. A steady increase in GAG content in all culture groups occurred up to day six, the content between the groups being very similar. At days 9 and 14 the mean GAG content in chondrocytes cultured in 0.1 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL hyaluronic acid was significantly greater (p = 0.005) than the control group. The largest increase (307%), occurred in the 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid group. At hyaluronic acid concentrations of 2.0 mg/mL and 3.0 mg/mL no significant difference in GAG content was found when compared with the control groups.

Table II.

Mean sulphated glycosaminoglycan content (μg/mL) of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured for up to 14 days in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid

Hyaluronic acid concentration
Day Control 0.1 mg/ml 1.0 mg/ml 2.0 mg/ml 3.0 mg/ml
0 8.12 8.09 8.08 8.08 8.09
3 12.89 13.09 13.00 12.95 12.90
6 15.71 16.10 15.96 15.89 15.85
9 25.98 28.98 27.32 26.30 26.17
14 30.85 32.95 32.61 32.00 31.34
Fig. 2  
            Bar chart showing sulphated glucosaminoglycan (GAG) content of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured for up to 14 days in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) (sem bars) (n = 6).

Fig. 2

Bar chart showing sulphated glucosaminoglycan (GAG) content of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured for up to 14 days in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) (sem bars) (n = 6).

Hydroxyproline analysis.

The level of hydroxyproline is a marker for collagen production by the chondrocytes. Figure 3 and Table III show the concentration of hydroxypro-line in the chondrocyte/alginate composite beads exposed to the different concentrations of hyaluronic acid. All the culture groups demonstrated a significant increase by day 14 (p = 0.007) compared with day 0. A significant interaction was observed between day and dose (p = 0.003); the effect of doses at 0.1 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL hyaluronic acid were, once again seen more clearly for days 9 and 14 than for earlier days. The mean increases in hydroxyproline concentration were significantly greater in the chondrocytes exposed to 0.1, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid compared with the control groups (p = 0.03) at days 9 and 14. The increase in hydroxyproline concentration in the hyaluronic acid groups demonstrated a dose-dependent response, with doses greater than 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid showing a smaller increase in hydroxyproline.

Table III.

Mean hydroxyproline content (μg/mL) of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured for up to 14 days in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid

Hyaluronic acid concentration
Day Control 0.1 mg/ml 1.0 mg/ml 2.0 mg/ml 3.0 mg/ml
0 3.02 3.03 3.02 2.01 3.08
3 3.55 4.1 3.77 3.52 3.56
6 8.88 10 9.37 8.91 8.92
9 16.23 20.99 18.74 17.33 17.05
14 25.51 29.02 27.75 26.51 26.11
Fig. 3  
            Bar chart showing hydroxyproline content of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured for up to 14 days in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) (sem bars) (n = 6)

Fig. 3

Bar chart showing hydroxyproline content of cell-seeded alginate bead constructs cultured for up to 14 days in medium containing varying concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) (sem bars) (n = 6)

Histology and immunolocalisation.

Histology demonstrated changes in cellular morphology, behaviour and extracellular matrix that were consistent with the biochemical findings. As a marker for cell proliferation, Ki-67 antigen immunostaining was strongly positive in the low-dose hyaluronic acid groups at day 14.

There was increased cellularity in the 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid (low-dose) and 3 mg/mL hyaluronic acid (high-dose) cultures compared with the control. Greatest cellularity occurred in the 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid specimens. The cells were either actively dividing or were present in small clusters of three to four cells. In the 3 mg/mL hyaluronic acid specimens, the cells had divided but fewer clusters were identified compared with the low-dose hyaluronic acid specimens. The results from the 2 mg/mL hyaluronic acid specimens showed intermediate findings. The majority of cells in the control group remained singular with very few mitotic figures.

The quality of the synthesised extracellular matrix was assessed by immunolocalisation of key articular cartilage matrix components. Increased levels of chondroitin-6-sulphate and collagen type II staining were present within culture specimens containing hyaluronic acid, compared with the controls. The presence of extracellular matrix rich in type II collagen and chondroitin-6-sulphate, combined with the absence of type I collagen, indicates that the chondrocytic phenotype was maintained throughout the culture period. Although the control specimens showed small increases in these components, the levels were by no means as marked as for the hyaluronic acid cultures. The most intense staining for collagen type II and chondroitin-6-sulphate was seen within beads containing 0.1 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL. Hyaluronic acid staining was less within beads containing 2 mg/mL and 3 mg/mL hyaluronic acid, although all were greater than the control beads.

The detection of chondroitin-6-sulphate indicated the presence of sulphated GAG. There was intense chondroitin-6-sulphate immunostaining around chondrocytes (in the territorial matrix) cultured in low-dose hyaluronic acid. Staining around the cells cultured in the control group, and with high concentration of hyaluronic acid, was less intense at day 14. Cells cultured in low concentrations of hyaluronic acid also stained more intensely for collagen type II. All chondrocytes cultured with hyaluronic acid stained negatively for collagen type I, whereas there was collagen type I staining within the control group.


The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hyaluronic acid on articular chondrocytes cultured in vitro using a hydrogel culture system.

The rationale behind the treatment of early osteoarthritis with intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections has been viscosupplementation therapy, which attempts to restore the elasticity and viscosity of synovial fluid to normal or higher levels.8 Pharmokinetic studies have shown that exogenous hyaluronic acid begins to leave the joint cavity within two hours of administration and is cleared completely within four days, but also showed that a fraction of the hyaluronic acid remains detectable in articular cartilage six hours after administration.16 The short duration of hyaluronic acid within the joint does not fully explain the indisputable long-term clinical efficacy seen in practice and appears to reject the proposed mechanism of action of exogenous hyaluronic acid as purely one of viscosupplementation. Hyaluronic acid possesses a number of protective physiochemical functions that may provide some additional chondroprotective effects in vivo and may explain its longer term effects on articular cartilage. These functions include scavenging of reactive oxygen-derived free radicals,25,26 inhibition of immune complex adherence to polymorphonuclear cells,25 inhibition of leucocyte and macrophage migration and aggregation,27 and regulation of fibroblast proliferation.28

We found that at low doses, hyaluronic acid has a significant stimulatory effect on the metabolic activity of chondrocytes that may provide an explanation for the longer term clinical benefits. Studies on osteoarthritic cartilage have shown that hyaluronic acid depletion in the extra-cellular matrix occurs before structural changes in proteoglycans are detectable.29,30 It is likely that physiochemical interactions occur between hyaluronic acid and chondrocytes which regulate their activity and ability to produce proteoglycans and type II collagen.

The recent identification of CD44, a glycoprotein expressed on the cell surface of chondrocytes, may help explain the method of interaction of hyaluronic acid with chondrocytes.29 CD44 has the capacity to function as a hyaluronic acid receptor at the chondrocyte cell surface. We found a dose-dependent response that could be attributed to a negative feedback system via CD44 receptors, whereby chondrocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix production is increased at low concentrations and decreased at high concentrations of hyaluronic acid. Our results are consistent with the findings of Kawasaki et al31 who, in collagen gels, found that cell numbers were greatest on exposure to low doses of 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronic acid, followed by 1.0 mg/mL hyaluronic acid.

If low concentrations of hyaluronic acid have a stimulatory effect on chondrocytes, this should occur in articular cartilage with low indigenous hyaluronic acid concentrations, such as in osteoarthritic cartilage.29,30 Despite the naturally low hyaluronic acid concentration, the structural progression of osteoarthritis appears to continue. There may be a number of possible factors that explain this paradox. This study used healthy bovine articular chondrocytes and it is possible that in vivo, osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes have a reduced level of interaction with their surrounding extracellular matrix, perhaps as a result of down-regulation of CD44 receptor expression, and thus a reduced level of response to hyaluronic acid. Further studies are needed to investigate this.

Our study has also demonstrated the potential of using the alginate/chondrocyte/hyaluronic acid construct as a cartilage transplant biomaterial for the repair of articular cartilage defects. Chondrocytes maintained their phenotype, and proliferated and synthesised extracellular matrix within the construct. A previous problem with alginate was a time-dependent leakage of hyaluronic acid from the scaffold so that sufficient hyaluronic acid retention could only be achieved in alginate gels with densities greater than 1.2%.32 In our study the alginate gel density used was 2%, and it was therefore assumed that sufficient hyaluronic acid retention was achieved in the bead. We modified the design of the alginate/hyaluronic acid culture system by supplementing the cell culture medium with hyaluronic acid of the same concentration as that in the alginate bead in order to address the problem of hyaluronic acid diffusion out of the alginate gel. This was to improve the diffusion of nutrients into the alginate from the medium and to allow sustained stimulatory effects of hyaluronic acid on the chondrocytes.

A recent study assessed the effect of hyaluronic acid on chondrocytes cultured in collagen gel as a potential construct and also found chondrocyte proliferation and GAG synthesis to be enhanced.31 Although chondrocyte proliferation was greater in the collagen gels, chondrocytes dedifferentiated into fibroblast-like cells after six days in culture. Chondrocytes cultured in alginate, however, maintained their phenotype.32,33

Alginate has been proposed as a suitable biomaterial for a construct in which chondrocytes can be embedded, cultured and transplanted into cartilage defects.34,35 We have shown that supplementation of hyaluronic acid into alginate to create an alginate/chondrocyte/hyaluronic acid construct could be a more suitable transplant system for cartilage repair including tissue-engineered repair of focal articular cartilage defects.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr M. Akmal; e-mail: M.Akmal@orthopaedics.com

We are very grateful to our laboratory support staff at the Institute of Orthopaedics, Stanmore, UK for help with cell culture and analysis.

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.


1 Goorman SD, Watanabe TK, Miller EH, Perry C. Functional outcome in knee osteoarthritis after treatment with hylan G-F 20: a prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000;81:479–83. Google Scholar

2 Adams ME, Atkinson MH, Lussier AJ, et al. The role of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a Canadian multicenter trial comparing hylan G-F 20 alone, hylan G-F 20 with NSAIDs and NSAIDs alone. Osteoarthritis Cartilage1995;3:213–26. Google Scholar

3 Adams ME. An analysis of clinical studies of the use of crosslinked hyaluronan, hylan, in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol1993;20(Suppl 39):16–18. Google Scholar

4 Dahl LB, Dahl IMS, Engstrom-Laurent A, Granath K. Concentration and molecular weight of sodium hyaluronate in synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other arthropathies. Ann Rheum Dis1985;44:817–22. Google Scholar

5 Hilbert BJ, Rowley G, Antonas KN. Hyaluronic acid concentration in synovial fluid from normal and arthritic joints of horses. Aust Vet J1984;61:22–4. Google Scholar

6 Sunblad L. Glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans in synovial fluid. In: Balazs EA, Jeanloz RW, eds. The amino sugars: the chemistry and biology of compounds containing amino sugars. New York: Academic Press, 1965:229–50. Google Scholar

7 Balazs EA, Watson D, Duff IF, Roseman S. Hyaluronic acid in synovial fluid: 1: molecular parameters of hyaluronic acid in normal and arthritic human fields. Arthritis Rheum1967;10:357–76. Google Scholar

8 Balazs EA, Denlinger JL. Viscosupplementation: a new concept in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol1993;20(Suppl 39):3–9. Google Scholar

9 Weiss C, Balazs EA, St Onge R, Denlinger JL. Clinical studies of the intra-articular injection of Healon® (sodium hyaluronate) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of human knees. Semin Arthritis Rheum1981;11(1 Suppl 1):143–4. Google Scholar

10 Puhl W, Bernau A, Greiling H, et al. Intra-articular sodium hyaluronate in osteoarthritis of the knee: a multicenter, double-blind study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage1993; 1:233–41. Google Scholar

11 Maheu E. Hyaluronan in knee osteoarthritis: a review of the clinical trials with hyalgan. Eur J Rheumatol Inflam1995;15:17–24. Google Scholar

12 Rosier RN, O’Keefe RJ. Hyaluronic acid therapy. Instr Course Lect2000;49:495–502. Google Scholar

13 Dougados M, Nguyen M, Listrat V, Amor B. High molecular weight sodium hyaluronate (hyalectin) in osteoarthritis of the knee: a 1 year placebo controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage1993;1:97–103. Google Scholar

14 Chow G, Knudson GB, Homandberg G, Knudson W. Increased expression of CD44 in bovine articular chondrocytes by catabolic cellular mediators. J Biol Chem1995;270:27734–41. Google Scholar

15 Knudson W, Casey B, Nishida Y, et al. Hyaluronan oligosaccharides perturb cartilage matrix homeostasis and induce chondrocytic chondrolysis. Arthritis Rheum2000; 43:1165–74. Google Scholar

16 Antonas KN, Fraser JRE, Muirden KD. Distribution of biologically labelled hyaluronic acid injected into joints. Ann Rheum Dis1973;32:103–11. Google Scholar

17 Esquisabel A, Hernandez RM, Igartua M, et al. Production of BCG alginate-PLL microcapsules by emulsification/integral gelation. Microencapsul1997;14:627–38. Google Scholar

18 Rao J, Otto WR. Flourimetric assay for cell growth estimation. Anal Biochem1992; 207:186–92. Google Scholar

19 Rago R, Mitchen J, Wilding G. DNA fluorometric assay in 96-well tissue culture plates using Hoechst 33258 after cell lysis by freezing in distilled water. Anal Biochem1990;191:31–4. Google Scholar

20 Farndale RW, Sayers CA, Barrett AJ. A direct spectrophotometric microassay for sulphated glycosaminoglycans in cartilage cultures. Connect Tissue Res1982;9:247–8. Google Scholar

21 Humbel R. Identification and quantitation of keratan sulphate in urine. Clin Chim Acta1974;52:173–7. Google Scholar

22 Taylor KB, Jeffree GM. A new basic metachromatic dye 1,9-dimethylene blue. Histochem J1969;1:199–204. Google Scholar

23 Ho KC, Pang CP. Automated analysis of urinary hydroxyproline. Clin Chim Act1989; 185:191–6. Google Scholar

24 Woods GS, Warnke R. Suppression of endogenous avidin-binding activity and its relevance to biotin-avidin detection systems. J Biol Histochemistry Cytochemistry1986;29:1196–204. Google Scholar

25 Sato H, Takahashi T, Ide H, et al. Antioxidant activity of synovial fluid, hyaluronic acid, and two subcomponents of hyaluronic acid: synovial fluid scavenging effect is enhanced in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum1988;31:63–71. Google Scholar

26 Larsen NE, Lombard KM, Parent EG, Balazs EA. The effect of hylan on cartilage and chondrocyte cultures. J Orthop Res1992;10:23–32. Google Scholar

27 Balazs EA, Denlinger JL. The role of hyaluronic acid in arthritis and its therapeutic use. In: Peyron JG, ed. Osteoarthritis: current clinical and fundamental problems. Basle: Geigy, 1984:165–74. Google Scholar

28 Goldberg RL, Toole BP. Hyaluronate inhibition of cell proliferation. Arthritis Rheum1987;30:769–78. Google Scholar

29 Manicourt DH, Pita JC. Progressive depletion of hyaluronic acid in early experimental arthritis in dogs. Arthritis Rheum1988;31:538–44. Google Scholar

30 Thonar EJ-M, Sweet MBE, Immelman AR, Lyons G. Hyaluronate in articular cartilage age related changes. Calcit Tissue1978;26:19–21. Google Scholar

31 Kawasaki K, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Adachi N, Matsusaki M. Hyaluronic acid enhances proliferation and chondroitin sulphate synthesis in cultured chondrocytes embedded in collagen gels. J Cell Physiol1999;179:142–8. Google Scholar

32 Lindenhayn K, Perka C, Spitzer RS, et al. Retention of hyaluronic acid in alginate beads: aspects for in vitro cartilage engineering. J Biomed Mater Res1999;44: 149–55. Google Scholar

33 Hauselmann HJ, Masuda K, Hunziker EB, et al. Adult human chondrocytes cultured in alginate form a matrix similar to native human articular cartilage. Am J Physiol1996;271:742–52. Google Scholar

34 Van Susante JL, Buma P, Van Osch GJ, et al. Culture of chondrocytes in alginate and collagen carrier gels. Acta Orthop Scand1995;66:549–56. Google Scholar

35 Fragonas E, Valente M, Pozzi-Mucelli M, et al. Articular cartilage repair in rabbits by using suspensions of allogenic chondrocytes in alginate. Biomaterials2000; 21:795–801. Google Scholar