Fractures of the odontoid peg are common spinal
injuries in the elderly. This study compares the survivorship of
a cohort of elderly patients with an isolated fracture of the odontoid
peg A total of 32 patients with an isolated odontoid fracture were
identified. The rate of mortality was 37.5% (n = 12) at one year.
The period of greatest mortality was within the first 12 weeks.
Time made a lesser contribution from then to one year, and there
was no impact of time on the rate of mortality thereafter. The rate
of mortality at one year was 41.2% for male patients (7 of 17) compared
with 33.3% for females (5 of 15). The rate of mortality at one year was 32% (225 of 702) for patients
with a fracture of the hip and 4% (9 of 221) for those with a fracture
of the wrist. There was no statistically significant difference
in the rate of mortality following a hip fracture and an odontoid
peg fracture (p = 0.95). However, the survivorship of the wrist
fracture group was much better than that of the odontoid peg fracture
group (p <
0.001). Thus, a fracture of the odontoid peg in the
elderly is not a benign injury and is associated with a high rate
of mortality, especially in the first three months after the injury. Cite this article:
No previous studies have examined the physical
characteristics of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). We compared
the anthropometric features of patients who developed CES after
a disc prolapse with those who did not but who had symptoms that
required elective surgery. We recorded the age, gender, height,
weight and body mass index (BMI) of 92 consecutive patients who
underwent elective lumbar discectomy and 40 consecutive patients who
underwent discectomy for CES. On univariate analysis, the mean BMI
of the elective discectomy cohort (26.5 kg/m2 (16.6 to
41.7) was very similar to that of the age-matched national mean
(27.6 kg/m2, p = 1.0). However, the mean BMI of the CES
cohort (31.1 kg/m2 (21.0 to 54.9)) was significantly
higher than both that of the elective group (p <
0.001) and the
age-matched national mean (p <
0.001). A similar pattern was
seen with the weight of the groups. Multivariate logistic regression
analysis was performed, adjusted for age, gender, height, weight
and BMI. Increasing BMI and weight were strongly associated with
an increased risk of CES (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, p <
0.001; and
OR 1.06, p <
0.001, respectively). However, increasing height
was linked with a reduced risk of CES (OR 0.9, p <
0.01). The
odds of developing CES were 3.7 times higher (95% confidence interval
(CI) 1.2 to 7.8, p = 0.016) in the overweight and obese (as defined
by the World Health Organization: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) than
in those of ideal weight. Those with very large discs (obstructing
>
75% of the spinal canal) had a larger BMI than those with small
discs (obstructing <
25% of the canal; p <
0.01). We therefore
conclude that increasing BMI is associated with CES.
The aim of this study was first, to determine
whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were
of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar
vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of ‘missed injury’. We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen
performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved
to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only
2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a
fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset
for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2
years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable
fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after
clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were
anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal
injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they
were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis
revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low
Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely
to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical
findings. This is the group at greatest risk. Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures
of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging
to reduce the risk of missed injury.