We have carried out a radiostereometric study of 50 patients (54 knees) with osteoarthritis of the knee who were randomly allocated to receive a cemented or a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component for total knee replacement. The patients were also stratified to receive one of three types of articulating surface (standard, rotating platform, Freeman-Samuelson (FS)1000) all based on the Freeman-Samuelson design. The tibial components were cemented in all cases. Radiostereometry was performed post-operatively and at 3, 12 and 24 months. The analysis was restricted to rotation of the femoral component over time.

After two years, rotation of the femoral components in the transverse, longitudinal and sagittal planes did not differ between the cemented and the hydroxyapatite-coated implants (p = 0.2 to 0.9).

In total knee replacements with a rotating platform, the femoral component tended to tilt more posteriorly than in the other two designs, regardless of the choice of fixation (cemented or hydroxyapatite-coated, p = 0.04). The standard version of the femoral component, whether cemented or hydroxyapatite-coated, rotated more into valgus than was observed with the rotating-platform and FS1000 designs (p = 0.005). The increased constraint provided by the FS1000 component did not appear to have any adverse effect on fixation of the femoral component.

We studied the kinetics of the knee in 20 patients (22 knees) 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), by using three-dimensional radiostereometry and film-exchanger techniques. Eleven knees had a concave (constrained) tibial implant and 11 a posterior-stabilised prosthesis. Eleven normal knees served as a control group.

In the posterior-stabilised knees there was less proximal and posterior displacement of the centre of the tibial plateau during extension from 45° to 15°, with a decrease in the anterior translation of the femoral condyles of 4 mm at 45°. There was less internal tibial rotation and increased distal positioning of the centre of the tibial plateau with both designs when compared with the normal knees, and in both the centre of the plateau was displaced posteriorly by more than 1 cm.

Increased AP translation has been recorded in all prosthetic designs so far studied by radiostereometry. The use of a posterior-stabilised design of tibial insert could reduce this translation but not to that of the normal knee.