Neuropathic changes in the foot are common with
a prevalence of approximately 1%. The diagnosis of neuropathic arthropathy
is often delayed in diabetic patients with harmful consequences
including amputation. The appropriate diagnosis and treatment can
avoid an extensive programme of treatment with significant morbidity
for the patient, high costs and delayed surgery. The pathogenesis
of a Charcot foot involves repetitive micro-trauma in a foot with impaired
sensation and neurovascular changes caused by pathological innervation
of the blood vessels. In most cases, changes are due to a combination
of both pathophysiological factors. The Charcot foot is triggered
by a combination of mechanical, vascular and biological factors
which can lead to late diagnosis and incorrect treatment and eventually
to destruction of the foot. This review aims to raise awareness of the diagnosis of the Charcot
foot (diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy and the differential
diagnosis, erysipelas, peripheral arterial occlusive disease) and
describe the ways in which the diagnosis may be made. The clinical
diagnostic pathways based on different classifications are presented. Cite this article:
We retrospectively compared wrist arthrodesis using the Mannerfelt technique in 19 or an AO-plate in 23 patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. The mean follow-up was for 76 months. Compared with the Mannerfelt fusion group, patients in the AO-plate group reported greater satisfaction with their wrist function (74% Both methods relieve pain and improve function. Overall, the activities of daily living scores and the patients’ subjective assessment of outcome tended to be higher in the AO-plate group than in the Mannerfelt fusion group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, although more postoperative complications occurred in the AO-plate group, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.
