Using tibial shaft fracture participants from a large, multicentre randomized controlled trial, we investigated if patient and surgical factors were associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at one year post-surgery. The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) trial examined adults with an open or closed tibial shaft fracture who were treated with either reamed or unreamed intramedullary nails. HRQoL was assessed at hospital discharge (for pre-injury level) and at 12 months post-fracture using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Dysfunction, SMFA Bother, 36-Item Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical, and SF-36 Mental Component scores. We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine if baseline and surgical factors, as well as post-intervention procedures within one year of fracture, were associated with these HRQoL outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.01. We hypothesize that, irrespective of the four measures used, prognosis is guided by both modifiable and non-modifiable factors and that patients do not return to their pre-injury level of function, nor HRQoL.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to quantify health state utility
values (HSUVs) after a tibial fracture, investigate the effect of
complications, to determine the trajectory in HSUVs that result
in these differences and to quantify the quality-adjusted life years
(QALYs) experienced by patients. This is an analysis of 2138 tibial fractures enrolled in the
Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW) and Study to Prospectively Evaluate
Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT)
trials. Patients returned for follow-up at two and six weeks and
three, six, nine and 12 months. Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) values
were calculated and used to calculate QALYs.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this prognostic study was to identify baseline
factors associated with physical health-related quality of life
(HRQL) in patients after a femoral neck fracture. The secondary
aims were to identify baseline factors associated with mental HRQL,
hip function, and health utility. Patients who were enrolled in the Fixation using Alternative
Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH) trial completed
the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and EuroQol 5-Dimension at
regular intervals for 24 months. We conducted multilevel mixed models
to identify factors potentially associated with HRQL. Aims
Patients and Methods
We have systematically reviewed the effect of alternative methods of stabilisation of open tibial fractures on the rates of reoperation, and the secondary outcomes of nonunion, deep and superficial infection, failure of the implant and malunion by the analysis of 799 citations on the subject, identified from computerised databases. Although 68 proved to be potentially eligible, only eight met all criteria for inclusion. Three investigators independently graded the quality of each study and extracted the relevant data. One study (n = 56 patients) suggested that the use of external fixators significantly decreased the requirement for reoperation when compared with fixation with plates. The use of unreamed nails, compared with external fixators (five studies, n = 396 patients), reduced the risk of reoperation, malunion and superficial infection. Comparison of reamed with unreamed nails showed a reduced risk of reoperation (two studies, n = 132) with the reamed technique. An indirect comparison between reamed nails and external fixators also showed a reduced risk of reoperation (two studies) when using nails. We have identified compelling evidence that unreamed nails reduced the incidence of reoperations, superficial infections and malunions, when compared with external fixators. The relative merits of reamed
We sought to quantify agreement by different assessors of the AO classification for distal fractures of the radius. Thirty radiographs of acute distal radial fractures were evaluated by 36 assessors of varying clinical experience. Our findings suggest that AO ‘type’ and the presence or absence of articular displacement are measured with high consistency when classification of distal radial fractures is undertaken by experienced observers. Assessors at all experience levels had difficulty agreeing on AO ‘group’ and especially AO ‘subgroup’. To categorise distal radial fractures according to joint displacement and AO type is simple and reproducible. Our study examined only whether distal radial fractures could be consistently classified according to the AO system. Validation of the classification as a predictor of outcome will require a prospective clinical study.
