One of the main causes of tibial revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty is aseptic loosening. Therefore, stable fixation between the tibial component and the cement, and between the tibial component and the bone, is essential. A factor that could influence the implant stability is the implant design, with its different variations. In an existing implant system, the tibial component was modified by adding cement pockets. The aim of this experimental in vitro study was to investigate whether additional cement pockets on the underside of the tibial component could improve implant stability. The relative motion between implant and bone, the maximum pull-out force, the tibial cement mantle, and a possible path from the bone marrow to the metal-cement interface were determined. A tibial component with (group S: Attune S+) and without (group A: Attune) additional cement pockets was implanted in 15 fresh-frozen human leg pairs. The relative motion was determined under dynamic loading (extension-flexion 20° to 50°, load-level 1,200 to 2,100 N) with subsequent determination of the maximum pull-out force. In addition, the cement mantle was analyzed radiologically for possible defects, the tibia base cement adhesion, and preoperative bone mineral density (BMD).Aims
Methods
The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation. Single and twin pegs were implanted randomly allocated in 12 pairs of human fresh-frozen femora. We generated 5° bone defects at the posterior condyle. Relative movement was simulated using a servohydraulic pulser, and analyzed at 70°/115° knee flexion. Relative movement was surveyed at seven points of measurement on implant and bone, using an optic system.Aims
Methods
Aseptic loosening of the femoral component is
an important indication for revision surgery in unicompartmental knee
replacement (UKR). A new design of femoral component with an additional
peg was introduced for the cemented Oxford UKR to increase its stability.
The purpose of this study was to compare the primary stability of
the two designs of component. Medial Oxford UKR was performed in 12 pairs of human cadaver
knees. In each pair, one knee received the single peg and one received
the twin peg design. Three dimensional micromotion and subsidence
of the component in relation to the bone was measured under cyclical
loading at flexion of 40° and 70° using an optical measuring system.
Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was performed to detect
differences between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the relative micromotion
(p = 0.791 and 0.380, respectively) and subsidence (p = 0.301 and
0.176, respectively) of the component between the two groups at
both angles of flexion. Both designs of component offered good strength
of fixation in this cadaver study. Cite this article:
