The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire are patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used for clinical and research purposes. Methodological high-quality clinimetric studies that determine the measurement properties of these PROMs when used in patients with a distal radial fracture are lacking. This study aimed to validate the PRWE and DASH in Dutch patients with a displaced distal radial fracture (DRF). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability, between PROMs completed twice with a two-week interval at six to eight months after DRF. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s α for the dimensions found in the factor analysis. The measurement error was expressed by the smallest detectable change (SDC). A semi-structured interview was conducted between eight and 12 weeks after DRF to assess the content validity.Objectives
Methods
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used to evaluate the outcome of treatment in patients with distal radial fractures. Which PROM to select is often based on assessment of measurement properties, such as validity and reliability. Measurement properties are assessed in clinimetric studies, and results are often reviewed without considering the methodological quality of these studies. Our aim was to systematically review the methodological quality of clinimetric studies that evaluated measurement properties of PROMs used in patients with distal radial fractures, and to make recommendations for the selection of PROMs based on the level of evidence of each individual measurement property. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMbase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant clinimetric studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies on measurement properties, using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Level of evidence (strong / moderate / limited / lacking) for each measurement property per PROM was determined by combining the methodological quality and the results of the different clinimetric studies.Objectives
Methods
We report a prospective cohort study of the midterm results of
surgical dislocation of the hip (according to Ganz) to perform resection
of osteochondromas involving the femoral neck in patients with multiple
hereditary exostoses (MHE). Hip range of movement (ROM) was assessed pre- and post-operatively.
Patients’ judgment of post-operative reduction of pain, symptoms,
the Rand 36-item Health Survey (RAND-36) and complications were
analysed. Aims
Methods
Current studies on the additional benefit of using computed tomography
(CT) in order to evaluate the surgeons’ agreement on treatment plans
for fracture are inconsistent. This inconsistency can be explained
by a methodological phenomenon called ‘spectrum bias’, defined as
the bias inherent when investigators choose a population lacking
therapeutic uncertainty for evaluation. The aim of the study is
to determine the influence of spectrum bias on the intra-observer
agreement of treatment plans for fractures of the distal radius. Four surgeons evaluated 51 patients with displaced fractures
of the distal radius at four time points: T1 and T2: conventional
radiographs; T3 and T4: radiographs and additional CT scan (radiograph
and CT). Choice of treatment plan (operative or non-operative) and
therapeutic certainty (five-point scale: very uncertain to very
certain) were rated. To determine the influence of spectrum bias,
the intra-observer agreement was analysed, using Kappa statistics,
for each degree of therapeutic certainty. Objectives
Methods
In the absence of patellar resurfacing, we have
previously shown that the use of electrocautery around the margin of
the patella improved the one-year clinical outcome of total knee
replacement (TKR). In this prospective randomised study we compared
the mean 3.7 year (1.1 to 4.2) clinical outcomes of 300 TKRs performed
with and without electrocautery of the patellar rim: this is an
update of a previous report. The overall prevalence of anterior knee
pain was 32% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 26 to 39), and 26% (95%
CI 18 to 35) in the intervention group compared with 38% (95% CI
29 to 48) in the control group (chi-squared test; p = 0.06). The
overall prevalence of anterior knee pain remained unchanged between
the one-year and 3.7 year follow-up (chi-squared test; p = 0.12). The
mean total Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis
Indices and the American Knee Society knee and function scores at
3.7 years’ follow-up were similar in the intervention and control
groups (repeated measures analysis of variance p = 0.43, p = 0.09
and p = 0.59, respectively). There were no complications. A total
of ten patients (intervention group three, control group seven)
required secondary patellar resurfacing after the first year. Our study suggests that the improved clinical outcome with electrocautery
denervation compared with no electrocautery is not maintained at
a mean of 3.7 years’ follow-up. Cite this article:
The efficacy of circumpatellar electrocautery in reducing the incidence of post-operative anterior knee pain is unknown. We conducted a single-centre, outcome-assessor and patient-blinded, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial to compare circumpatellar electrocautery with no electrocautery in total knee replacement in the absence of patellar resurfacing. Patients requiring knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis were randomly assigned circumpatellar electrocautery (intervention group) or no electrocautery (control group). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of anterior knee pain. A secondary measure was the standardised clinical and patient-reported outcomes determined by the American Knee Society scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index. A total of 131 knees received circumpatellar electrocautery and 131 had no electrocautery. The overall incidence of anterior knee pain at follow-up at one year was 26% (20% to 31%), with 19% (12% to 26%) in the intervention group and 32% (24% to 40%) in the control group (p = 0.02). The relative risk reduction from electrocautery was 40% (9% to 61%) and the number needed to treat was 7.7 (4.3 to 41.4). The intervention group had a better mean total WOMAC score at follow-up at one year compared with the control group (16.3 (0 to 77.7) Our study suggests that in the absence of patellar resurfacing electrocautery around the margin of the patella improves the outcome of total knee replacement.
