The Single Assessment Numerical Evalution (SANE) score is a pragmatic alternative to longer patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the SANE and hip-specific PROMs in a generalized population of patients with hip pain at a single timepoint upon initial visit with an orthopaedic surgeon who is a hip preservation specialist. We hypothesized that SANE would have a strong correlation with the 12-question International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT)-12, the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), providing evidence for concurrent validity of the SANE and hip-specific outcome measures in patients with hip pain. This study was a cross-sectional retrospective database analysis at a single timepoint. Data were collected from 2,782 patients at initial evaluation with a hip preservation specialist using the iHOT-12, HOS, HOOS, and SANE. Outcome scores were retrospectively analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients.Aims
Methods
Conventional uncemented femoral implants provide
dependable long-term fixation in patients with a wide range of functional
requirements. Yet challenges associated with proximal–distal femoral
dimensional mismatch, preservation of bone stock, and minimally
invasive approaches have led to exploration into alternative implant designs.
Short stem designs focusing on a stable metaphyseal fit have emerged
to address these issues in total hip replacement (THR). Uncemented
metaphyseal-engaging short stem implants are stable and are associated
with proximal bone remodeling closer to the metaphysis when compared
with conventional stems and they also have comparable clinical performances.
Short stem metaphyseal-engaging implants can meet the goals of a
successful THR, including tolerating a high level of patient function,
as well as durable fixation. Cite this article:
