This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognosis of patients with spinal metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignancy (SM-IMM). We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 338 patients who underwent surgical treatment for metastatic spinal disease. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups. The SM-IMM group included patients with no history of malignancy whose site of primary malignancy was diagnosed after the identification of spinal metastasis. The other group included patients with a history of treatment for primary malignancy who then developed spinal metastasis (SM-DTM). The incidence of SM-IMM by site of primary malignancy was calculated. The difference between prognoses after surgical treatment for SM-IMM and SM-DTM was established.Aims
Patients and Methods
We investigated the spinopelvic morphology and
global sagittal balance of patients with a degenerative retrolisthesis
or anterolisthesis. A total of 269 consecutive patients with a degenerative
spondylolisthesis were included in this study. There were 95 men
and 174 women with a mean age of 64.3 years ( A backward slip was found in the upper lumbar levels (mostly
L2 or L3) with an almost equal gender distribution in both the R
and R+A groups. The pelvic incidence and sacral slope of the R group
were significantly lower than those of the A (both p <
0.001)
and R+A groups (both p <
0.001). The lumbar lordosis of the R+A
group was significantly greater than that of the R (p = 0.025) and
A groups (p = 0.014). The C7 plumb line of the R group was located
more posteriorly than that of the A group (p = 0.023), but was no
different from than that of the R+A group (p = 0.422). The location
of C7 plumb line did not differ between the three groups (p = 0.068).
The spinosacral angle of the R group was significantly smaller than
that of the A group (p <
0.001) and R+A group (p <
0.001). Our findings imply that there are two types of degenerative retrolisthesis:
one occurs primarily as a result of degeneration in patients with
low pelvic incidence, and the other occurs secondarily as a compensatory
mechanism in patients with an anterolisthesis and high pelvic incidence. Cite this article:
