Our aim was to examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes
in 257 consecutive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKAs)
(238 patients), five years post-operatively. A retrospective evaluation was undertaken of patients treated
between April 2008 and October 2010 in a regional centre by two
non-designing surgeons with no previous experience of UKAs. The
Oxford Knee Scores (OKSs) were recorded and fluoroscopically aligned
radiographs were assessed post-operatively at one and five years.Aims
Patients and Methods
In an initial randomised controlled trial (RCT)
we segregated 180 patients to one of two knee positions following total
knee replacement (TKR): six hours of knee flexion using either a
jig or knee extension. Outcome measures included post-operative
blood loss, fall in haemoglobin, blood transfusion requirements,
knee range of movement, limb swelling and functional scores. A second
RCT consisted of 420 TKR patients randomised to one of three post-operative
knee positions: flexion for three or six hours post-operatively,
or knee extension. Positioning of the knee in flexion for six hours immediately
after surgery significantly reduced blood loss (p = 0.002). There
were no significant differences in post-operative range of movement,
swelling, pain or outcome scores between the various knee positions
in either study. Post-operative knee flexion may offer a simple
and cost-effective way to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements
following TKR. We also report a cautionary note regarding the potential risks
of prolonged knee flexion for more than six hours observed during
clinical practice in the intervening period between the two trials,
with 14 of 289 patients (4.7%) reporting lower limb sensory neuropathy
at their three-month review. Cite this article:
The Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
(OUKR) was developed to address problems related to cementation,
and has been demonstrated in a randomised study to have similar
clinical outcomes with fewer radiolucencies than observed with the
cemented device. However, before its widespread use it is necessary
to clarify contraindications and assess the complications. This
requires a larger study than any previously published. We present a prospective multicentre series of 1000 cementless
OUKRs in 881 patients at a minimum follow-up of one year. All patients
had radiological assessment aligned to the bone–implant interfaces
and clinical scores. Analysis was performed at a mean of 38.2 months
(19 to 88) following surgery. A total of 17 patients died (comprising
19 knees (1.9%)), none as a result of surgery; there were no tibial
or femoral loosenings. A total of 19 knees (1.9%) had significant
implant-related complications or required revision. Implant survival
at six years was 97.2%, and there was a partial radiolucency at
the bone–implant interface in 72 knees (8.9%), with no complete radiolucencies.
There was no significant increase in complication rate compared
with cemented fixation (p = 0.87), and no specific contraindications
to cementless fixation were identified. Cementless OUKR appears to be safe and reproducible in patients
with end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, with radiological
evidence of improved fixation compared with previous reports using
cemented fixation. Cite this article:
