Acetabular dysplasia is frequently associated with intra-articular
pathology such as labral tears, but whether labral tears should
be treated at the time of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains
controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical
outcomes and radiographic corrections of PAO for acetabular dysplasia
between patients with and without labral tears pre-operatively. We retrospectively reviewed 70 hips in 67 patients with acetabular
dysplasia who underwent PAO. Of 47 hips (45 patients) with labral
tears pre-operatively, 27 (25 patients) underwent PAO alone, and
were classified as the labral tear alone (LT) group, and 20 (20
patients) underwent combined PAO and osteochondroplasty, and were
classified as the labral tear osteochondroplasty (LTO) group. The
non-labral tear (NLT) group included 23 hips in 22 patients.Aims
Patients and Methods
Several radiological methods of measuring anteversion
of the acetabular component after total hip replacement (THR) have
been described. These studies used different definitions and reference
planes to compare methods, allowing for misinterpretation of the
results. We compared the reliability and accuracy of five current
methods using plain radiographs (those of Lewinnek, Widmer, Liaw,
Pradhan, and Woo and Morrey) with CT measurements, using the same
definition and reference plane. We retrospectively studied the plain
radiographs and CT scans in 84 hips of 84 patients who underwent
primary THR. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were high for
the measurement of inclination and anteversion with all methods
on plain radiographs and CT scans. The measurements of inclination on
plain radiographs were similar to the measurements using CT (p =
0.043). The mean difference between CT measurements was 0.6° (-5.9°
to 6.8°). Measurements using Widmer’s method were the most similar to those
using CT (p = 0.088), with a mean difference between CT measurements
of -0.9° (-10.4° to 9.1°), whereas the other four methods differed
significantly from those using CT (p <
0.001). This study has shown that Widmer’s method is the best for evaluating
the anteversion of the acetabular component on plain radiographs. Cite this article:
We compared the dynamic instability of 25 dysplastic hips in 25 patients using triaxial accelerometry before and one year after periacetabular osteotomy. We also evaluated the hips clinically using the Harris hip score and assessed acetabular orientation by radiography before surgery and after one year. The mean overall magnitude of acceleration was significantly reduced from 2.30 m/s This study suggests that periacetabular osteotomy provides pain relief, improves acetabular cover and reduces the dynamic instability in patients with dysplastic hips.
The existing methods of assessing limb lengthening during total hip arthroplasty (THA) are prone to error because the measurements are not parallel to the limb lengthening axis. In order to address this, we designed a caliper to estimate limb lengthening during THA and evaluated its accuracy compared with our previous device, the straight caliper. Limb lengths were measured in 100 patients. The L-shaped caliper was used in 50 cases and the straight caliper in 50. The correlation between intra-operative and post-operative radiographic measurements was significantly improved using the L-shaped device (p <
0.0001, r = 0.934). This method was extremely accurate in predicting changes in limb length due to surgery.