We evaluated the quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis
in orthopaedic surgery by examining how they adhere to validated
methodological standards in their development. A structured review
was performed for guidelines that were published between January
2005 and April 2013 in medical journals or on the Internet. A pre-defined
computerised search was used in MEDLINE, Scopus and Google to identify
the guidelines. The AGREE II assessment tool was used to evaluate
the quality of the guidelines in the study. Seven international and national guidelines were identified.
The overall methodological quality of the individual guidelines
was good. ‘Scope and Purpose’ (median score 98% interquartile range
(IQR)) 86% to 98%) and ‘Clarity of Presentation’ (median score 90%,
IQR 90% to 95%) were the two domains that received the highest scores. ‘Applicability’
(median score 68%, IQR 45% to 75%) and ‘Editorial Independence’
(median score 71%, IQR 68% to 75%) had the lowest scores. These findings reveal that although the overall methodological
quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery
is good, domains within their development, such as ‘Applicability’
and ‘Editorial Independence’, need to be improved. Application of
the AGREE II instrument by the authors of guidelines may improve
the quality of future guidelines and provide increased focus on
aspects of methodology used in their development that are not robust. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:19–23.
The purpose of this study was to establish whether
exploration and neurolysis is an effective method of treating neuropathic
pain in patients with a sciatic nerve palsy after total hip replacement
(THR). A total of 56 patients who had undergone this surgery at
our hospital between September 1999 and September 2010 were retrospectively identified.
There were 42 women and 14 men with a mean age at exploration of
61.2 years (28 to 80). The sciatic nerve palsy had been sustained
by 46 of the patients during a primary THR, five during a revision
THR and five patients during hip resurfacing. The mean pre-operative
visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was 7.59 (2 to 10), the mean
post-operative VAS was 3.77 (0 to 10), with a resulting mean improvement
of 3.82 (0 to 10). The pre- and post-neurolysis VAS scores were
significantly different (p <
0.001). Based on the findings of
our study, we recommend this form of surgery over conservative management
in patients with neuropathic pain associated with a sciatic nerve
palsy after THR. Cite this article:
