A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.Aims
Methods
We performed a retrospective study of the factors affecting the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures in 43 patients reviewed at two to nine years after injury. We determined the functional result in relation to the use of a diastasis screw, the accuracy of reduction, the presence of tibiotalar dislocation, and of injury to the medial side of the ankle by medial malleolar fracture or deltoid ligament rupture. We assessed the use of a diastasis screw as appropriate or inappropriate on the basis of an anatomical study performed by Boden et al (1989). The diastasis screw was used unnecessarily in 19 of the 31 patients so treated, but this did not appear to affect the final functional result. The worse functional results were in ankles dislocated at the initial injury, and in those with medial malleolar fractures as opposed to those with deltoid ligament ruptures. The best results were after accurate reduction of the fibula and the syndesmosis, and greater increase in the width of the syndesmosis was associated with a worse result. Our results suggest that an increase of more than 1.5 mm in syndesmosis width is unacceptable. We recommend that when the deltoid ligament is ruptured, a diastasis screw should be used if the fibular fracture is more than 3.5 cm above the top of the syndesmosis. When a medial malleolar fracture has been rigidly repaired a diastasis screw is required if the fibular fracture is more than 15 cm above the syndesmosis.
We report a case of neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis in which non-invasive ultrasonic examination provided clear definition of the injury.
Unilateral Colles' fractures in 187 patients over the age of 55 years were studied in a randomised prospective trial: 97 fractures were minimally displaced and were treated either conventionally or in a crepe bandage; 90 displaced Colles' fractures were reduced and of these 47 were treated conventionally while 43 were encouraged to mobilise the wrist in a cast which restricted extension. Early wrist movement hastened functional recovery and led to earlier resolution of wrist swelling. Discomfort was no greater than in patients who were treated conventionally. The bony deformity, which recurred irrespective of the method of treatment, was not adversely affected by early mobilisation.