Cemented femoral stems with force closed fixation
designs have shown good clinical results despite high early subsidence.
A new triple-tapered stem in this category (C-stem AMT) was introduced
in 2005. This study compares this new stem with an established stem
of similar design (Exeter) in terms of migration (as measured using radiostereometric
analysis), peri-prosthetic bone remodelling (measured using dual
energy x-ray densitometry, DXA), Oxford Hip Score, and plain radiographs. A total of 70 patients (70 hips) with a mean age of 66 years
(53 to 78) were followed for two years. Owing to missing data of
miscellaneous reasons, the final analysis represents data from 51
(RSA) and 65 (DXA) patients. Both stems showed a typical pattern
of migration: Subsidence and retroversion that primarily occurred
during the first three months. C-stem AMT subsided less during the
first three months (p = 0.01), before stabilising at a subsidence rate
similar to the Exeter stem from years one to two. The rate of migration
into retroversion was slightly higher for C-stem AMT during the
second year (p = 0.03). Whilst there were slight differences in
movement patterns between the stems, the C-stem AMT exhibits good
early clinical outcomes and displays a pattern of migration and
bone remodelling that predicts good clinical performance. Cite this article:
