The primary aim of this study was to determine the morbidity
of a tibial strut autograft and characterize the rate of bony union
following its use. We retrospectively assessed a series of 104 patients from a single
centre who were treated with a tibial strut autograft of > 5 cm
in length. A total of 30 had a segmental reconstruction with continuity
of bone, 27 had a segmental reconstruction without continuity of
bone, 29 had an arthrodesis and 18 had a nonunion. Donor-site morbidity
was defined as any event that required a modification of the postoperative
management. Union was assessed clinically and radiologically at
a median of 36 months (IQR, 14 to 74).Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to define immediate post-operative ‘quality’ in total hip replacements and to study prospectively the occurrence of failure based on these definitions of quality. The evaluation and assessment of failure were based on ten radiological and clinical criteria. The cumulative summation (CUSUM) test was used to study 200 procedures over a one-year period. Technical criteria defined failure in 17 cases (8.5%), those related to the femoral component in nine (4.5%), the acetabular component in 32 (16%) and those relating to discharge from hospital in five (2.5%). Overall, the procedure was considered to have failed in 57 of the 200 total hip replacements (28.5%). The use of a new design of acetabular component was associated with more failures. For the CUSUM test, the level of adequate performance was set at a rate of failure of 20% and the level of inadequate performance set at a failure rate of 40%; no alarm was raised by the test, indicating that there was no evidence of inadequate performance. The use of a continuous monitoring statistical method is useful to ensure that the quality of total hip replacement is maintained, especially as newer implants are introduced.
