Aims. With up to 40% of patients having patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA), the two arthroplasty options are to replace solely the patellofemoral joint via patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or the entire knee via
Aims. The purpose of this study is to determine an individual’s age-specific prevalence of
Aims. This study compared patient-reported outcomes of three
Aims. The use of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to delay
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the migration of the femoral component, five years postoperatively, between patients with a highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) insert and those with a conventional polyethylene (PE) insert in an uncemented Triathlon fixed insert cruciate-retaining
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare a bicruciate-retaining (BCR)
Aims. We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of OpenPose, a posture estimation algorithm, for measurement of knee range of motion after
Aims. Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented
Aims. This study aims to determine the rate of and risk factors for
Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding
Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and patterns of neuropathic pain over one year in a cohort of patients with chronic post-surgical pain at three months following
Aims. Despite new technologies for
Aims.
Aims. Distal femoral resection in conventional
Aims. Robotic arm-assisted surgery offers accurate and reproducible guidance in component positioning and assessment of soft-tissue tensioning during knee arthroplasty, but the feasibility and early outcomes when using this technology for revision surgery remain unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic arm-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to
Aims. Treatment of end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) of the knee is commonly approached using one of two surgical strategies: medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or
Aims. This prospective study reports longitudinal, within-patient, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over a 15-year period following cemented single radius
Aims. Loosening of components after
Aims. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications of
Aims.