The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs). We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.Aims
Methods
In this study of patients who underwent internal fixation without
fusion for a burst thoracolumbar or lumbar fracture, we compared
the serial changes in the injured disc height (DH), and the fractured
vertebral body height (VBH) and kyphotic angle between patients
in whom the implants were removed and those in whom they were not. Radiological
parameters such as injured DH, fractured VBH and kyphotic angle
were measured. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Greenough
low back outcome scale and a VAS scale for pain. Between June 1996 and May 2012, 69 patients were analysed retrospectively;
47 were included in the implant removal group and 22 in the implant
retention group. After a mean follow-up of 66 months (48 to 107),
eight patients (36.3%) in the implant retention group had screw
breakage. There was no screw breakage in the implant removal group.
All radiological and functional outcomes were similar between these
two groups. Although solid union of the fractured vertebrae was
achieved, the kyphotic angle and the anterior third of the injured
DH changed significantly with time (p <
0.05). Methods
Results
Between January 1990 and December 2000 we carried out 226 SB Charité III disc replacements for lumbar disc degeneration in 160 patients. They were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 79 months (31 to 161) to determine the clinical and radiological outcome. The clinical results were collected by an independent observer, who was not involved in patient selection, treatment or follow-up, using a combination of outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index. Pain was recorded using a visual analogue score, and the most recent radiographs were reviewed. Survival of the device was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and showed a cumulative survival of 35% at 156 months when radiological failure was taken as the endpoint. The mean improvement in the Oswestry disability index scores after disc replacement was 14% (6% to 21%) and the mean improvement in the pain score was 1.6 (0.46 to 2.73), both falling below the clinically significant threshold. Removal of the implant was required in 12 patients, four because of implant failure. These poor results indicate that further use of this implant is not justified.
