The high revision rates of the DePuy Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) and the DePuy ASR XL (the total hip arthroplasty (THA) version) have led to questions over the viability of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip joints. Some designs of MoM hip joint do, however, have reasonable mid-term performance when implanted in appropriate patients. Investigations into the reasons for implant failure are important to offer help with the choice of implants and direction for future implant designs. One way to assess the performance of explanted hip prostheses is to measure the wear (in terms of material loss) on the joint surfaces. In this study, a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used to measure the wear on five failed cementless Biomet Magnum/ReCap/ Taperloc large head MoM THAs, along with one Biomet ReCap resurfacing joint. Surface roughness measurements were also taken. The reason for revision of these implants was pain and/or adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) and/or elevated blood metal ion levels.Objectives
Methods
Louis Pasteur once said that: “Fortune favours
the prepared mind.” As one of the great scientists who contributed
to the fight against infection, he emphasised the importance of
being prepared at all times to recognise infection and deal with
it. Despite the many scientific discoveries and technological advances,
such as the advent of antibiotics and the use of sterile techniques,
infection continues to be a problem that haunts orthopaedic surgeons
and inflicts suffering on patients. The medical community has implemented many practices with the
intention of preventing infection and treating it effectively when
it occurs. Although high-level evidence may support some of these
practices, many are based on little to no scientific foundation.
Thus, around the world, there is great variation in practices for
the prevention and management of periprosthetic joint infection. This paper summaries the instigation, conduct and findings of
a recent International Consensus Meeting on Surgical Site and Periprosthetic
Joint Infection. Cite this article:
Metal artefact reduction (MAR) MRI is now widely
considered to be the standard for imaging metal-on-metal (MoM) hip
implants. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
(MHRA) has recommended cross-sectional imaging for all patients
with symptomatic MoM bearings. This paper describes the natural
history of MoM disease in a 28 mm MoM total hip replacement (THR)
using MAR MRI. Inclusion criteria were patients with MoM THRs who had
not been revised and had at least two serial MAR MRI scans. All
examinations were reported by an experienced observer and classified
as A (normal), B (infection) or C1–C3 (mild, moderate, severe MoM-related
abnormalities). Between 2002 and 2011 a total of 239 MRIs were performed
on 80 patients (two to four scans per THR); 63 initial MRIs (61%)
were normal. On subsequent MRIs, six initially normal scans (9.5%)
showed progression to a disease state; 15 (15%) of 103 THRs with
sequential scans demonstrated worsening disease on subsequent imaging. Most patients with a MoM THR who do not undergo early revision
have normal MRI scans. Late progression (from normal to abnormal,
or from mild to more severe MoM disease) is not common and takes
place over several years. Cite this article:
