The aims of this study were to evaluate the abductor function in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), comparing the results of a corrective osteotomy at the base of the femoral neck and osteoplasty with 1) A total of 24 patients (mean age 14.9 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
This study analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of
anatomical reduction of a moderate or severe stable slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated by subcapital osteotomy (a modified
Dunn osteotomy) through the surgical approach described by Ganz. We prospectively studied 31 patients (32 hips; 16 females and
five males; mean age 14.3 years) with SCFE. On the Southwick classification,
ten were of moderate severity (head-shaft angle >
30° to 60°) and
22 were severe (head-shaft angle >
60°). Each underwent open reduction
and internal fixation using an intracapsular osteotomy through the
physeal growth plate after safe surgical hip dislocation. Unlike
the conventional procedure, 25 hips did not need an osteotomy of
the apophysis of the great trochanter and were managed using an
extended retinacular posterior flap. Aims
Patients and Methods
Between June 2001 and November 2008 a modified Dunn osteotomy with a surgical hip dislocation was performed in 30 hips in 28 patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Complications and clinical and radiological outcomes after a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (1.0 to 8.5) were documented. Subjective outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire. Anatomical or near-anatomical reduction was achieved in all cases. The epiphysis in one hip showed no perfusion intra-operatively and developed avascular necrosis. There was an excellent outcome in 28 hips. Failure of the implants with a need for revision surgery occurred in four hips. Anatomical reduction can be achieved by this technique, with a low risk of avascular necrosis. Cautious follow-up is necessary in order to avoid implant failure.
Controversy remains whether the contralateral
hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the
outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation
with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients
underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of
the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a
mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip
without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications
was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical
(p <
0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse.
Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral
SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation.
Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was
found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality
adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective
operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a
further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with
unilateral fixation. Cite this article:
