Arthroplasties of the elbow, including total elbow arthroplasty, radial head arthroplasty, distal humeral hemiarthroplasty, and radiocapitellar arthroplasty, are rarely undertaken. This scoping review aims to outline the current research in this area to inform the development of future research. A scoping review was undertaken adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines using Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and trial registries, limited to studies published between 1 January 1990 and 7 February 2021. Endnote software was used for screening and selection, and included randomized trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, and case series of ten or more patients reporting the clinical outcomes of elbow arthroplasty. The results are presented as the number of types of studies, sample size, length of follow-up, clinical outcome domains and instruments used, sources of funding, and a narrative review.Aims
Methods
The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to
treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic
tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff
tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only
remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed
HA to rTSA. A total of 35 patients, in whom a HA, as treatment for a fracture
of the proximal humerus, had failed, underwent conversion to a rTSA.
A total of 28 were available for follow-up at a mean of 61 months
(37 to 91), having been initially reviewed at a mean of 20 months
(12 to 36) postoperatively. Having a convertible design, the humeral
stem could be preserved in nine patients. The stem was removed in
the other 19 patients and a conventional rTSA was implanted. At
final follow-up, patients were assessed using the American Shoulder
and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant Score, and plain radiographs.Aims
Material and Methods
Revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is often challenging.
The aim of this study was to report on the clinical and radiological
results of revision arthroplasty of the elbow with the Latitude
TEA. Between 2006 and 2010 we used the Latitude TEA for revision in
18 consecutive elbows (17 patients); mean age 53 years (28 to 80);
14 women. A Kudo TEA was revised in 15 elbows and a Souter-Strathclyde
TEA in three. Stability, range of movement (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS)
for pain and functional scores, Elbow Functional Assessment Scale
(EFAS), the Functional Rating Index of Broberg and Morrey (FRIBM)
and the Modified Andrews’ Elbow Scoring System (MAESS) were assessed
pre-operatively and at each post-operative follow-up visit (six,
12 months and biennially thereafter). Radiographs were analysed
for loosening, fractures and dislocation. The mean follow-up was
59 months (26 to 89).Aims
Patients and Methods
