Aims. Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs. Methods. This is a retrospective review of 233 patients who underwent PFEPR. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD 18.2), and 99 (42.5%) were male. There were 90 patients with primary bone tumours (38.6%), 122 with metastatic bone disease (52.4%), and 21 with haematological malignancy (9.0%). A total of 128 patients had monopolar (54.9%), 74 had bipolar hemiarthroplasty heads (31.8%), and 31 underwent acetabular arthroplasty (13.3%). Results. At a mean 74.4 months follow-up, the overall revision rate was 15.0%. Primary malignancy (p < 0.001) and age < 50 years (p < 0.001) were risk factors for revision. The risks of death and implant failure were similar in patients with primary disease (p = 0.872), but the risk of death was significantly greater for patients who had metastatic bone disease (p < 0.001). Acetabular-related implant failures comprised 74.3% of revisions; however, no difference between hemiarthroplasty or arthroplasty groups (p = 0.209), or between monopolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasties (p = 0.307), was observed. There was greater radiological wear in patients with longer follow-up and primary bone malignancy. Re-revision rates following a revision PFEPR was 34.3%, with dual-mobility bearings having the lowest rate of instability and re-revision (15.4%). Conclusion. Hemiarthroplasty and arthroplasty PFEPRs carry the same risk of revision in the medium term, and is primarily due to acetabular complications. There is no difference in revision rates or erosion between monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties. The main causes of failure were acetabular wear in the hemiarthroplasty group and instability in the arthroplasty group. These risks should be balanced and patient prognosis considered when contemplating the
To evaluate mid-to long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of malignant tumours arising around the knee, and to investigate the risk factors for unfavourable PROMs. The medical records of 75 patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and 44 patients who were alive and available for follow-up (at a mean of 9.7 years postoperatively) were included in the study. Leg length discrepancy was measured on whole-leg radiographs, and functional assessment was performed with PROMs (Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Comprehensive Outcome Measure for Musculoskeletal Oncology Lower Extremity (COMMON-LE)) with two different aspects. The thresholds for unfavourable PROMs were determined using anchor questions regarding satisfaction, and the risk factors for unfavourable PROMs were investigated.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study is to determine the predictors of overall survival (OS) and predictive factors of poor prognosis of conventional high-grade osteosarcoma of the limbs in a single-centre in South Africa. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis to identify the prognostic factors that predict the OS of patients with histologically confirmed high-grade conventional osteosarcoma of the limbs over ten years. We employed the Cox proportional regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method for statistical analysis.Aims
Methods
We have previously reported cryoablation-assisted joint-sparing surgery for osteosarcoma with epiphyseal involvement. However, it is not clear whether this is a comparable alternative to conventional joint arthroplasty in terms of oncological and functional outcomes. A total of 22 patients who had localized osteosarcoma with epiphyseal involvement around the knee and underwent limb salvage surgery were allocated to joint preservation (JP) group and joint arthroplasty (JA) group. Subjects were followed with radiographs, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, and clinical evaluations at one, three, and five years postoperatively.Aims
Methods
Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prosthesis characteristics and associated conditions that may modify the survival of total femoral endoprosthetic replacements (TFEPR). Patients and Methods. In all, 81 patients treated with TFEPR from 1976 to 2017 were retrospectively evaluated and failures were categorized according to the Henderson classification. There were 38 female patients (47%) and 43 male patients (53%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 43 years (12 to 86). The mean follow-up time was 10.3 years (0 to 31.7). A survival analysis was performed followed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression to identify independent implant survival factors. Results. The revision-free survival of the implant was 71% at five years and 63.3% at ten years. Three prostheses reached 15 years without revision. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score in the group was 26 (23 to 28). The mechanisms of failure were infection in 18%, structural failures in 6%, tumour progression in 5%, aseptic loosening in 2%, and soft-tissue failures in 1%. Prostheses used for primary reconstruction after oncological resections had lower infection rates than revision implants (8% vs 25%; p = 0.001). The rates of infection in silver-coated and non-silver-coated prosthesis were similar (17.4% vs 19.%; p = 0.869). The incidence of hip dislocation was 10%. Rotating hinge prosthesis had a lower failure rate than fixed hinge prosthesis (5.3% vs 11%). After Cox regression, the independent factors associated with failures were the history of previous operations (hazard ratio (HR) 3.7; p = 0.041), and the associated arthroplasty of the proximal tibia (HR 3.8; p = 0.034). At last follow-up, 11 patients (13%) required amputation. Conclusion. TFEPR offers a reliable reconstruction option for massive bone loss of the femur, with a good survival when the prosthesis is used as a primary implant. The use of a rotating hinge at the knee and dual mobility
Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. We retrospectively reviewed 209 consecutive patients who, between 1991 and 2016, had undergone resection of the distal femur for tumour and reconstruction using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. The study endpoint was failure of the prosthesis, defined as removal of the femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; major revision (exchange of the femoral component, tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or amputation.Aims
Methods
Limb salvage for pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum is a major surgical challenge. There remains no consensus about what is the optimum type of reconstruction after resection of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes in these patients according to the methods of periacetabular reconstruction. The study involved a consecutive series of 122 patients with a periacetabular bone sarcoma who underwent limb-salvage surgery involving a custom-made prosthesis in 65 (53%), an ice-cream cone prosthesis in 21 (17%), an extracorporeal irradiated autograft in 18 (15%), and nonskeletal reconstruction in 18 (15%).Aims
Methods
There is an increased risk of dislocation of the hip after the resection of a periacetabular tumour and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the defect in the hemipelvis. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and timing of dislocation and to identify its risk factors. To determine the dislocation rate, we conducted a retrospective single-institution study of 441 patients with a periacetabular tumour who had undergone a standard modular hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction between 2003 and 2019. After excluding ineligible patients, 420 patients were enrolled. Patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables were studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.Aims
Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to assess the current trends in the estimation of survival and the preferred forms of treatment of pathological fractures among national and international general and oncological orthopaedic surgeons, and to explore whether improvements in the management of these patients could be identified in this way. All members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Society (DOS) and the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire containing 12 cases.Aims
Materials and Methods
The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
Following the resection of an extensive amount of bone in the
treatment of a tumour, the residual segment may be insufficient
to accept a standard length intramedullary cemented stem. Short-stemmed
endoprostheses conceivably have an increased risk of aseptic loosening.
Extra-cortical plates have been added to minimise this risk by supplementing
fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the survivorship
of short-stemmed endoprostheses and extra-cortical plates. The study involved 37 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery
for a primary neoplasm of bone between 1998 and 2013. Endoprosthetic
replacement involved the proximal humerus in nine, the proximal
femur in nine, the distal femur in 13 and the proximal tibia in
six patients. There were 12 primary (32%) and 25 revision procedures (68%).
Implant survivorship was compared with matched controls. The amount
of bone that was resected was >
70% of its length and statistically
greater than the standard control group at each anatomical site.Aims
Patients and Methods
Free vascularised fibular grafting has been used for the treatment
of large bony defects for more than 40 years. However, there is
little information about the risk factors for failure and whether
newer locking techniques of fixation improve the rates of union.
The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of union of free
fibular grafts fixed with locking and traditional techniques, and
to quantify the risk factors for nonunion and failure. A retrospective review involved 134 consecutive procedures over
a period of 20 years. Of these, 25 were excluded leaving 109 patients
in the study. There were 66 men and 43 women, with a mean age of
33 years (5 to 78). Most (62) were performed for oncological indications,
and the most common site (52) was the lower limb. Rate of union
was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for
nonunion were assessed using Cox regression. All patients were followed
up for at least one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to establish what happens to patients
in the long term after endoprosthetic replacement for a primary
malignant tumour of bone. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained
database to identify all patients who had undergone an endoprosthetic
replacement more than 25 years ago and who were still alive. Their
outcomes were investigated with reference to their complications and
need for further surgery. A total of 230 patients were identified.
Their mean age at diagnosis was 20.7 years (five to 62). The most
common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (132). The most common site was
the distal femur (102). Aims
Patients and Methods
Pelvic reconstruction after the resection of a tumour around
the acetabulum is a challenging procedure due to the complex anatomy
and biomechanics. Several pelvic endoprostheses have been introduced,
but the rates of complication remain high. Our aim was to review
the use of a stemmed acetabular pedestal cup in the management of
these patients. The study involved 48 patients who underwent periacetabular reconstruction
using a stemmed pedestal cup (Schoellner cup; Zimmer Biomet Inc.,
Warsaw, Indiana) between 2000 and 2013. The indications for treatment included
a primary bone tumour in 27 patients and metastatic disease in 21
patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was
52 years (16 to 83).Aims
Patients and Methods
Few studies dealing with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis are currently
available. Different data about the overall survival and prognostic
factors have been published but without a detailed analysis of surgery-related complications.
We aimed to analyse the outcome of a series of pelvic chondrosarcomas
treated at a single institution, with particular attention to the
prognostic factors. Based on a competing risk model, our objective
was to identify risk factors for the development of complications. In a retrospective single-centre study, 58 chondrosarcomas (26
patients alive, 32 patients dead) of the pelvis were reviewed. The
mean follow-up was 13 years (one week to 23.1 years).Aims
Patients and Methods
Due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, limb-sparing resections
of pelvic tumours achieving adequate surgical margins, can often
be difficult. The advent of computer navigation has improved the
precision of resection of these lesions, though there is little
evidence comparing resection with or without the assistance of navigation. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of navigation-assisted surgery
for the resection of pelvic bone tumours involving the posterior
ilium and sacrum. Using our prospectively updated institutional database, we conducted
a retrospective case control study of 21 patients who underwent
resection of the posterior ilium and sacrum, for the treatment of
a primary sarcoma of bone, between 1987 and 2015. The resection
was performed with the assistance of navigation in nine patients
and without navigation in 12. We assessed the accuracy of navigation-assisted
surgery, as defined by the surgical margin and how this affects
the rate of local recurrence, the disease-free survival and the
effects on peri-and post-operative morbidity. Aims
Patients and Methods
Vascularised fibular grafts (VFGs ) are a valuable
surgical technique in limb salvage after resection of a tumour.
The primary objective of this multicentre study was to assess the
risk factors for failure and complications for using a VFG after
resection of a tumour. The study involved 74 consecutive patients (45 men and 29 women
with mean age of 23 years (1 to 64) from four tertiary centres for
orthopaedic oncology who underwent reconstruction using a VFG after
resection of a tumour between 1996 and 2011. There were 52 primary
and 22 secondary reconstructions. The mean follow-up was 77 months
(10 to 195). In all, 69 patients (93%) had successful limb salvage; all of
these united and 65 (88%) showed hypertrophy of the graft. The mean
time to union differed between those involving the upper (28 weeks;
12 to 96) and lower limbs (44 weeks; 12 to 250). Fracture occurred
in 11 (15%), and nonunion in 14 (19%) patients. In 35 patients (47%) at least one complication arose, with a
greater proportion in lower limb reconstructions, non-bridging osteosynthesis,
and in children. These complications resulted in revision surgery
in 26 patients (35%). VFG is a successful and durable technique for reconstruction
of a defect in bone after resection of a tumour, but is accompanied
by a significant risk of complications, that often require revision
surgery. Union was not markedly influenced by the need for chemo-
or radiotherapy, but should not be expected during chemotherapy.
Therefore, restricted weight-bearing within this period is advocated. Cite this article:
We determined the efficacy of a devitalised autograft
(n = 13) and allograft (n = 16) cortical strut bone graft combined
with long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction in the treatment of
massive tumours of the lower limb. A total of 29 patients (18 men:11
women, mean age 20.1 years (12 to 45) with a ratio of length of
resection to that of the whole prosthesis of >
50% were treated
between May 2003 and May 2012. The mean follow-up was 47 months
(15 to 132). The stem of the prosthesis was introduced through bone
graft struts filled with cement, then cemented into the residual
bone. Bone healing was achieved in 23 patients (86%). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumour Society functional score was 85% (57 to 97). The five-year
survival rate of the endoprostheses was 81% (95% confidence intervals
67.3 to 92.3). The mean length of devitalised autografts and allografts
was 8.6 cm (5 to 15), which increased the ratio of the the length
of the stem of the prosthesis to that of the whole length of the
prosthesis from a theoretical 35% to an actual 55%. Cortical strut bone grafting and long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction
is an option for treating massive segmental defects following resection
of a tumour in the lower limb. Patients can regain good function
with a low incidence of aseptic loosening. The strut graft and the
residual bone together serve as a satisfactory bony environment
for a revision prosthesis, if required, once union is achieved. Cite this article:
We evaluated the clinical results and complications
after extra-articular resection of the distal femur and/or proximal
tibia and reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS) in
59 patients (mean age 33 years (11 to 74)) with malignant bone or
soft-tissue tumours. According to a Kaplan–Meier analysis, limb
survival was 76% (95% confidence interval (CI) 64.1 to 88.5) after
a mean follow-up of 4.7 years (one month to 17 years). Peri-prosthetic infection
was the most common indication for subsequent amputation (eight
patients). Survival of the prosthesis without revision was 48% (95%
CI 34.8 to 62.0) at two years and 25% (95% CI 11.1 to 39.9) at five years
post-operatively. Failure of the prosthesis was due to deep infection
in 22 patients (37%), aseptic loosening in ten patients (17%), and
peri-prosthetic fracture in six patients (10%). Wear of the bearings
made a minor revision necessary in 12 patients (20%). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 23 (10 to 29). An extensor lag >
10° was
noted in ten patients (17%). These results suggest that limb salvage after extra-articular
resection with a tumour prosthesis can achieve good functional results
in most patients, although the rates of complications and subsequent
amputation are higher than in patients treated with intra-articular
resection. Cite this article:
