The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in incidence rate of shoulder arthroplasty, indications, and surgeon volume trends associated with these procedures between January 2003 and April 2021 in the province of Nova Scotia, Canada. A total of 1,545 patients between 2005 and 2021 were analyzed. Patients operated on between 2003 and 2004 were excluded due to a lack of electronic records. Overall, 84.1% of the surgeries (n = 1,299) were performed by two fellowship-trained upper limb surgeons, with the remainder performed by one of the 14 orthopaedic surgeons working in the province.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to use national registry database information to estimate cumulative rates and relative risk of revision due to infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We included 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties recorded between 2004 and 2013 in The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) data set. With the Kaplan–Meier method, we illustrated the ten-year cumulative rates of revision due to infection and with the Cox regression model, we reported the hazard ratios as a measure of the relative risk of revision due to infection.Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study, we evaluated patient-reported
outcomes, the rate of revision and the indications for revision
following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in patients
with osteoarthritis. All patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary resurfacing
hemiarthroplasty and reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty
Registry (DSR), between January 2006 and December 2010 were included.
There were 772 patients (837 arthroplasties) in the study. The Western
Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index was used to
evaluate patient-reported outcome 12 months (10 to 14) post-operatively.
The rates of revision were calculated from the revisions reported
to the DSR up to December 2011 and by checking deaths with the Danish National
Register of Persons. A complete questionnaire was returned by 688 patients (82.2%).
The mean WOOS was 67 (0 to 100). A total of 63 hemiarthroplasties
(7.5%) required revision; the cumulative five-year rate of revision
was 9.9%. Patients aged <
55 years had a statistically significant
inferior WOOS score, which exceeded the minimal clinically important
difference, compared with older patients (mean difference 14.2 (8.8;
95% CI 19.6; p <
0.001), but with no increased risk of revision.
There was no significant difference in the mean WOOS or the risk
of revision between designs of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty. Cite this article:
