Aims. To determine mortality risk after first revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for
Aims. We aimed to compare the implant survival, complications, readmissions, and mortality of Vancouver B2
Aims.
Aims. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the incidence of early
Aims. We investigated patient characteristics and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral component revision and/or osteosynthesis. Patients and Methods. The study utilized data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) and information from patient records. We included all primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in Sweden since 1979, and undergoing further surgery due to Vancouver type B
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with revision surgery for the surgical management of Unified Classification System (UCS) type B
Aims. This aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System (UCS) for postoperative
Aims. We compared implant and patient survival following intraoperative
Aims. Vancouver type B
Aims. The aim of this study was to estimate the 90-day risk of revision for
The Unified Classification System (UCS), or Vancouver system, is a validated and widely used classification system to guide the management of
Aims. The aim of this study was to determine both the incidence of, and the reoperation rate for, postoperative
Aims.
Aims. Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of
Aims. Periprosthetic fracture is a significant complication of total
hip and knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to describe the survival
of patients sustaining
We reviewed retrospectively the outcome of the treatment by impaction grafting of
The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Vancouver
type B2 and B3 fractures by performing a systematic review of the
methods of surgical treatment which have been reported. A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and
the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. For inclusion,
studies required a minimum of ten patients with a Vancouver type
B2 and/or ten patients with a Vancouver type B3 fracture, a minimum
mean follow-up of two years and outcomes which were matched to the type
of fracture. Studies were also required to report the rate of re-operation
as an outcome measure. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO
database. Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter). This retrospective cohort study assessed 152 operatively managed consecutive unilateral Vancouver B fractures involving Exeter stems; 130 were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 22 with revision arthroplasty. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (SD 2.6; 3.2 to 12.1). The primary outcome measure was revision of at least one component. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for revision following ORIF. Secondary outcomes included any reoperation, complications, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and mortality.Aims
Methods