Joint registries classify all further arthroplasty procedures to a knee with an existing partial arthroplasty as revision surgery, regardless of the actual procedure performed. Relatively minor procedures, including bearing exchanges, are classified in the same way as major operations requiring augments and stems. A new classification system is proposed to acknowledge and describe the detail of these procedures, which has implications for risk, recovery, and health economics. Classification categories were proposed by a surgical consensus group, then ranked by patients, according to perceived invasiveness and implications for recovery. In round one, 26 revision cases were classified by the consensus group. Results were tested for inter-rater reliability. In round two, four additional cases were added for clarity. Round three repeated the survey one month later, subject to inter- and intrarater reliability testing. In round four, five additional expert partial knee arthroplasty surgeons were asked to classify the 30 cases according to the proposed revision partial knee classification (RPKC) system.Aims
Methods
This study aims to evaluate a new home medical stretching device called the Self Treatment Assisted Knee (STAK) tool to treat knee arthrofibrosis. 35 patients post-major knee surgery with arthrofibrosis and mean range of movement (ROM) of 68° were recruited. Both the STAK intervention and control group received standard physiotherapy for eight weeks, with the intervention group additionally using the STAK at home. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were collected at all timepoints. An acceptability and home exercise questionnaire capturing adherence was recorded after each of the interventions.Aims
Methods
Structural allografts may be used to manage uncontained
bone defects in revision total knee replacement (TKR). However,
the availability of cadaver grafts is limited in some areas of Asia.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcome of the
use of femoral head allografts for the reconstruction of uncontained
defects in revision TKR, focusing on complications related to the
graft. We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (30 TKRs) with Anderson
Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type 3 bone defects, who underwent
revision using femoral head allografts and stemmed components. The
mean number of femoral heads used was 1.7 (1 to 3). The allograft–host
junctions were packed with cancellous autograft. At a mean follow-up of 76 months (38 to 136) the mean American
Knee Society knee score improved from 37.2 (17 to 60) pre-operatively
to 90 (83 to 100) (p <
0.001). The mean function score improved
from 26.5 (0 to 50) pre-operatively to 81 (60 to 100) (p <
0.001).
All the grafts healed to the host bone. The mean time to healing
of the graft was 6.6 months
(4 to 16). There have been no complications of collapse of the graft,
nonunion, infection or implant loosening. No revision surgery was
required. The use of femoral head allografts in conjunction with a stemmed
component and autogenous bone graft in revision TKR in patients
with uncontained bone defects resulted in a high rate of healing
of the graft with minimal complications and a satisfactory outcome.
Longer follow-up is needed to observe the evolution of the graft. Cite this article:
