To evaluate how abnormal proximal femoral anatomy affects different femoral version measurements in young patients with hip pain. First, femoral version was measured in 50 hips of symptomatic consecutively selected patients with hip pain (mean age 20 years (SD 6), 60% (n = 25) females) on preoperative CT scans using different measurement methods: Lee et al, Reikerås et al, Tomczak et al, and Murphy et al. Neck-shaft angle (NSA) and α angle were measured on coronal and radial CT images. Second, CT scans from three patients with femoral retroversion, normal femoral version, and anteversion were used to create 3D femur models, which were manipulated to generate models with different NSAs and different cam lesions, resulting in eight models per patient. Femoral version measurements were repeated on manipulated femora.Aims
Methods
In this in vitro study of the
hip joint we examined which soft tissues act as primary and secondary
passive rotational restraints when the hip joint is functionally
loaded. A total of nine cadaveric left hips were mounted in a testing
rig that allowed the application of forces, torques and rotations
in all six degrees of freedom. The hip was rotated throughout a
complete range of movement (ROM) and the contributions of the iliofemoral
(medial and lateral arms), pubofemoral and ischiofemoral ligaments
and the ligamentum teres to rotational restraint was determined
by resecting a ligament and measuring the reduced torque required
to achieve the same angular position as before resection. The contribution
from the acetabular labrum was also measured. Each of the capsular
ligaments acted as the primary hip rotation restraint somewhere
within the complete ROM, and the ligamentum teres acted as a secondary
restraint in high flexion, adduction and external rotation. The
iliofemoral lateral arm and the ischiofemoral ligaments were primary
restraints in two-thirds of the positions tested. Appreciation of
the importance of these structures in preventing excessive hip rotation
and subsequent impingement/instability may be relevant for surgeons
undertaking both
Objectives. To validate the precision of digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and the model-based method (MBM) RSA with respect to benchmark marker-based (MM) RSA for evaluation of kinematics in the native hip joint. Methods. Seven human cadaveric hemipelves were CT scanned and bone models were segmented. Tantalum beads were placed in the pelvis and proximal femoral bone. RSA recordings of the hips were performed during flexion, adduction and internal rotation. Stereoradiographic recordings were all analyzed with DRR, MBM and MM. Migration results for the MBM and DRR with respect to MM were compared. Precision was assessed as systematic bias (mean difference) and random variation (Pitman’s test for equal variance). Results. A total of 288 dynamic RSA images were analyzed. Systematic bias for DRR and MBM with respect to MM in translations (p < 0.018 mm) and rotations (p < 0.009°) were approximately 0. Pitman’s test showed lower random variation in all degrees of freedom for DRR compared with MBM (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Systematic error was approximately 0 for both DRR or MBM. However, precision of DRR was statistically significantly better than MBM. Since DRR does not require marker insertion it can be used for investigation of preoperative hip kinematics in comparison with the postoperative results after
