This prospective multicentre study was undertaken
to determine whether the timing of the post-operative administration
of bisphosphonate affects fracture healing and the rate of complication
following an intertrochanteric fracture. Between August 2008 and
December 2009, 90 patients with an intertrochanteric fracture who
underwent internal fixation were randomised to three groups according
to the timing of the commencement of risedronate treatment after
surgery: Group A (from one week after surgery), Group B (from one
month after surgery), and Group C (from three months after surgery).
The radiological time to fracture healing was assessed as the primary
endpoint, and the incidence of complications, including excessive
displacement or any complication requiring revision surgery, as
the secondary endpoint. The mean time to fracture healing post-operatively
in groups A, B and C was 10.7 weeks ( This study demonstrates that the timing of the post-operative
administration of bisphosphonates does not appear to affect the
rate of healing of an intertrochanteric fracture or the incidence
of complications.
This multicentre prospective clinical trial aimed
to determine whether
The aim of this study was to perform the first population-based description of the epidemiological and health economic burden of fracture-related infection (FRI). This is a retrospective cohort study of operatively managed orthopaedic trauma patients from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2016, performed in Queensland, Australia. Record linkage was used to develop a person-centric, population-based dataset incorporating routinely collected administrative, clinical, and health economic information. The FRI group consisted of patients with International Classification of Disease 10th Revision diagnosis codes for deep infection associated with an implanted device within two years following surgery, while all others were deemed not infected. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as healthcare utilization costs, were compared.Aims
Methods
The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study was performed to provide clarity in open fracture management previously skewed by small, specialist centre studies and large, unfocused registry investigations. We report the current management metrics of open fractures across the UK. Patients admitted to hospital with an open fracture (excluding phalanges or isolated hand injuries) between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 were included. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture software. All domains of the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Open Fracture Management were recorded.Aims
Method
We describe the impact of a targeted performance
improvement programme and the associated performance improvement
interventions, on mortality rates, error rates and process of care
for haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Clinical
care and performance improvement data for 185 adult patients with exsanguinating
pelvic trauma presenting to a United Kingdom Major Trauma Centre
between January 2007 and January 2011 were analysed with univariate
and multivariate regression and compared with National data. In
total 62 patients (34%) died from their injuries and opportunities
for improved care were identified in one third of deaths. Three major interventions were introduced during the study period
in response to the findings. These were a massive haemorrhage protocol,
a decision-making algorithm and employment of specialist pelvic
orthopaedic surgeons. Interventions which improved performance were
associated with an annual reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.64
(95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.93), p = 0.02), a reduction
in error rates (p = 0.024) and significant improvements in the targeted
processes of care. Exsanguinating patients with pelvic trauma are
complex to manage and are associated with high mortality rates;
implementation of a targeted performance improvement programme achieved
sustained improvements in mortality, error rates and trauma care
in this group of severely injured patients. Cite this article:
Most animal studies indicate that early irrigation
and debridement reduce infection after an open fracture. Unfortunately,
these studies often do not involve antibiotics. Clinical studies
indicate that the timing of initial debridement does not affect
the rate of infection but these studies are observational and fraught
with confounding variables. The purpose of this study was to control
these variables using an animal model incorporating systemic antibiotics
and surgical treatment. We used a rat femur model with a defect which was contaminated
with No animal that received antibiotics and surgery two hours after
injury had detectable bacteria. When antibiotics were started at
two hours, a delay in surgical treatment from two to six hours significantly
increased the development of infection (p = 0.047). However, delaying
surgery to 24 hours increase the rate of infection, but not significantly
(p = 0.054). The timing of antibiotics had a more significant effect
on the proportion of positive samples than earlier surgery. Delaying
antibiotics to six or 24 hours had a profoundly detrimental effect
on the infection rate regardless of the timing of surgery. These
findings are consistent with the concept that bacteria progress
from a vulnerable planktonic form to a treatment-resistant biofilm.
There have been many advances in the resuscitation
and early management of patients with severe injuries during the
last decade. These have come about as a result of the reorganisation
of civilian trauma services in countries such as Germany, Australia
and the United States, where the development of trauma systems has
allowed a concentration of expertise and research. The continuing
conflicts in the Middle East have also generated a significant increase
in expertise in the management of severe injuries, and soldiers
now survive injuries that would have been fatal in previous wars.
This military experience is being translated into civilian practice. The aim of this paper is to give orthopaedic surgeons a practical,
evidence-based guide to the current management of patients with
severe, multiple injuries. It must be emphasised that this depends
upon the expertise, experience and facilities available within the
local health-care system, and that the proposed guidelines will
inevitably have to be adapted to suit the local resources.