The aim of this study was to describe the use of 3D-printed sacral endoprostheses to reconstruct the pelvic ring and re-establish spinopelvic stability after total We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients who underwent TES in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2017. We divided the patients into three groups on the basis of the method of reconstruction: an endoprosthesis group (n = 10); a combined reconstruction group (n = 14), who underwent non-endoprosthetic combined reconstruction, including anterior spinal column fixation; and a spinopelvic fixation (SPF) group (n = 8), who underwent only SPF. Spinopelvic stability, implant survival (IS), intraoperative haemorrhage rate, and perioperative complication rate in the endoprosthesis group were documented and compared with those of other two groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
We hypothesised that the use of computer navigation-assisted
surgery for pelvic and sacral tumours would reduce the risk of an
intralesional margin. We reviewed 31 patients (18 men and 13 women)
with a mean age of 52.9 years (13.5 to 77.2) in whom computer navigation-assisted
surgery had been carried out for a bone tumour of the pelvis or
sacrum. There were 23 primary malignant bone tumours, four metastatic
tumours and four locally advanced primary tumours of the rectum.
The registration error when using computer navigation was <
1 mm
in each case. There were no complications related to the navigation,
which allowed the preservation of sacral nerve roots (n = 13), resection
of otherwise inoperable disease (n = 4) and the avoidance of hindquarter
amputation (n = 3). The intralesional resection rate for primary
tumours of the pelvis and sacrum was 8.7% (n = 2): clear bone resection
margins were achieved in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 13.1
months (3 to 34) three patients (13%) had developed a local recurrence.
The mean time alive from diagnosis was 16.8 months (4 to 48). Computer navigation-assisted surgery is safe and has reduced
our intralesional resection rate for primary tumours of the pelvis
and sacrum. We recommend this technique as being worthy of further
consideration for this group of patients. Cite this article:
