As the population ages and the surgical complexity of lumbar spinal surgery increases, the preoperative stratification of risk becomes increasingly important. Understanding the risks is an important factor in decision-making and optimizing the preoperative condition of the patient. Our aim was to determine whether the modified five-item frailty index (mFI-5) and nutritional parameters could be used to predict postoperative complications in patients undergoing simple or complex lumbar spinal fusion. We retrospectively reviewed 584 patients who had undergone lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disease. The 'simple' group (SG) consisted of patients who had undergone one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion. The 'complex' group (CG) consisted of patients who had undergone fusion over three or more levels, or combined anterior and posterior surgery. On admission, the mFI-5 was calculated and nutritional parameters collected.Aims
Methods
With recent progress in cancer treatment, the number of advanced-age patients with spinal metastases has been increasing. It is important to clarify the influence of advanced age on outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases, especially with a focus on subjective health state values. We prospectively analyzed 101 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery from 2013 to 2016. These patients were divided into two groups based on age (< 70 years and ≥ 70 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), Barthel index (BI), and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) score were assessed at study enrolment and at one, three, and six months after surgery. The survival times and complications were also collected.Aims
Methods
Patients seeking cervical spine surgery are thought to be increasing
in age, comorbidities and functional debilitation. The changing
demographics of this population may significantly impact the outcomes
of their care, specifically with regards to complications. In this
study, our goals were to determine the rates of functionally dependent
patients undergoing elective cervical spine procedures and to assess
the effect of functional dependence on 30-day morbidity and mortality
using a large, validated national cohort. A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons
National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data files from 2006
to 2013 was conducted to identify patients undergoing common cervical
spine procedures. Multivariate logistic regression models were generated
to analyse the independent association of functional dependence
with 30-day outcomes of interest.Aims
Patients and Methods
Despite the increasing prevalence of sleep apnoea,
little information is available regarding its impact on the peri-operative
outcome of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion. Using a
national database, patients who underwent lumbar fusion between
2006 and 2010 were identified, sub-grouped by diagnosis of sleep
apnoea and compared. The impact of sleep apnoea on various outcome
measures was assessed by regression analysis. The records of 84
655 patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion were identified
and 7.28% (n = 6163) also had a diagnostic code for sleep apnoea.
Compared with patients without sleep apnoea, these patients were
older, more frequently female, had a higher comorbidity burden and
higher rates of peri-operative complications, post-operative mechanical
ventilation, blood product transfusion and intensive care. Patients
with sleep apnoea also had longer and more costly periods of hospitalisation. In the regression analysis, sleep apnoea emerged as an independent
risk factor for the development of peri-operative complications
(odds ratio (OR) 1.50, confidence interval (CI) 1.38;1.62), blood
product transfusions (OR 1.12, CI 1.03;1.23), mechanical ventilation
(OR 6.97, CI 5.90;8.23), critical care services (OR 1.86, CI 1.71;2.03), prolonged
hospitalisation and increased cost (OR 1.28, CI 1.19;1.37; OR 1.10,
CI 1.03;1.18). Patients with sleep apnoea who undergo posterior lumbar fusion
pose significant challenges to clinicians. Cite this article:
This review of the literature presents the current understanding of Scheuermann’s kyphosis and investigates the controversies concerning conservative and surgical treatment. There is considerable debate regarding the pathogenesis, natural history and treatment of this condition. A benign prognosis with settling of symptoms and stabilisation of the deformity at skeletal maturity is expected in most patients. Observation and programmes of exercise are appropriate for mild, flexible, non-progressive deformities. Bracing is indicated for a moderate deformity which spans several levels and retains flexibility in motivated patients who have significant remaining spinal growth. The loss of some correction after the completion of bracing with recurrent anterior vertebral wedging has been reported in approximately one-third of patients. Surgical correction with instrumented spinal fusion is indicated for a severe kyphosis which carries a risk of progression beyond the end of growth causing cosmetic deformity, back pain and neurological complications. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of different techniques and types of instrumentation. Techniques include posterior-only and combined anteroposterior spinal fusion with or without posterior osteotomies across the apex of the deformity. Current instrumented techniques include hybrid and all-pedicle screw constructs.
