The role of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is being questioned by
the use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment
of medial compartment femorotibial osteoarthritis. Our aim was to
compare the outcomes of revision HTO or UKA to a total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) using computer-assisted surgery in matched groups of patients. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and
radiological outcome of patients who underwent revision of a HTO
to a TKA (group 1) with those who underwent revision of a medial
UKA to a TKA (group 2). All revision procedures were performed using
computer-assisted surgery. We extracted these groups of patients
from our database. They were matched by age, gender, body mass index,
follow-up and pre-operative functional score. The outcomes included
the Knee Society Scores (KSS), radiological outcomes and the rate
of further revision.Aims
Patients and Methods
