Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of
the duration of symptoms (DOS) prior to diagnosis on the overall
survival in patients with a primary bone sarcoma. In a retrospective analysis of a sarcoma database at a single
institution between 1990 and 2014, we identified 1446 patients with
non-metastatic and 346 with metastatic bone sarcoma. Low-grade types
of tumour were excluded. Our data included the demographics of the
patients, the characteristics of the tumour, and the survival outcome
of patients. Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan–Meier
survival analysis were performed, and the survivorship of the non-metastatic
and metastatic cohorts were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods