The Unispacer knee system is a cobalt-chrome self-centring tibial hemiarthroplasty device for use in the treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. The indications for use are similar to those for high tibial osteotomy, but insertion does not require bone cuts or component fixation, and does not compromise future knee replacement surgery. A prospective study of a consecutive series of 18 patients treated with the Unispacer between June 2003 and August 2004 was carried out to determine the early clinical results of this device. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (40 to 57). A total of eight patients (44%) required revision within two years. In two patients revision to a larger spacer was required, and in six conversion to either a unicompartmental or total knee replacement was needed. At the most recent review 12 patients (66.7%) had a Unispacer remaining in situ. The mean modified visual analogue score for these patients at a mean follow-up of 19 months (12 to 26) was 3.0 (0 to 11.5). The mean pain level was 30% that of the mean pre-operative level of 10. The early clinical results using this device have been disappointing.

This study demonstrates that use of the Unispacer in isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis is associated with a high rate of revision surgery and provides unpredictable relief of pain.

Of 111 primary ankle ligament arthroplasties (modified Evans procedure) performed between 1983 and 1994, we were able to identify 89 patients (94 ankles) for follow-up. All were under 50 years of age. Two had died and one refused to co-operate; 86 patients (91 ankles) were therefore reviewed, 25 by telephone and the remainder by clinical examination with all but three also undergoing radiological review.

Of the 91 ankles, 70 had no or very mild pain and 72 had no or rare episodes of instability and when considered together only 59 (65%) had no or mild pain and minimal instability. The results were supported by the Karlsson grading system. Clinical examination showed that 17 of the 66 ankles examined had increased inversion, while 21 had some limitation of inversion. Early degenerative changes were seen in 11 ankles, although only four had subtalar changes. These results show that this procedure does not give universally good clinical results. Patient satisfaction, however, was high with 97.7% being willing to undergo the same procedure if their other ankle became similarly affected.