The aim of this study was to evaluate the ten-year
clinical and functional outcome of hip resurfacing and to compare it
with that of cementless hip arthroplasty in patients under the age
of 55 years. Between 1999 and 2002, 80 patients were enrolled into the study:
24 were randomised (11 to hip resurfacing, 13 to total hip arthroplasty),
18 refused hip resurfacing and chose cementless total hip arthroplasty
with a 32 mm bearing, and 38 insisted on resurfacing. The mean follow-up
for all patients was 12.1 years (10 to 14). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically at one year,
five years and ten years. Outcome measures included EuroQol EQ5D,
Oxford, Harris hip, University of California Los Angeles and University
College Hospital functional scores. No differences were seen between the two groups in the Oxford
or Harris hip scores or in the quality of life scores. Despite a
similar aspiration to activity pre-operatively, a higher proportion
of patients with a hip resurfacing were running and involved in
sport and heavy manual labour after ten years. We found significantly higher function scores in patients who
had undergone hip resurfacing than in those with a cementless hip
arthroplasty at ten years. This suggests a functional advantage
for hip resurfacing. There were no other attendant problems. Cite this article:
Intact abductors of the hip play a crucial role
in preventing limping and are known to be damaged through the direct lateral
approach. The extent of trauma to the abductors after revision total
hip replacement (THR) is unknown. The aim of this prospective study
was to compare the pre- and post-operative status of the gluteus
medius muscle after revision THR. We prospectively compared changes
in the muscle and limping in 30 patients who were awaiting aseptic
revision THR and 15 patients undergoing primary THR. The direct
lateral approach as described by Hardinge was used for all patients.
MRI scans of the gluteus medius and functional analyses were recorded
pre-operatively and six months post-operatively. The overall mean
fatty degeneration of the gluteus medius increased from 35.8% (1.1
to 98.8) pre-operatively to 41% (1.5 to 99.8) after multiple revision
THRs (p = 0.03). There was a similar pattern after primary THR,
but with considerably less muscle damage (p = 0.001), indicating
progressive muscle damage. Despite an increased incidence of a positive
Trendelenburg sign following revision surgery (p = 0.03) there was
no relationship between the cumulative fatty degeneration in the
gluteus medius and a positive Trendelenburg sign (p = 0.26). The
changes associated with other surgical approaches to the hip warrant
investigation. Cite this article:
The practice of removing a well-fixed cementless
femoral component is associated with high morbidity. Ceramic bearing
couples are low wearing and their use minimises the risk of subsequent
further revision due to the production of wear debris. A total of
165 revision hip replacements were performed, in which a polyethylene-lined acetabular
component was revised to a new acetabular component with a ceramic
liner, while retaining the well-fixed femoral component. A titanium
sleeve was placed over the used femoral trunnion, to which a ceramic
head was added. There were 100 alumina and 65 Delta bearing couples
inserted. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly from 71.3 (9.0
to 100.0) pre-operatively to 91.0 (41.0 to 100.0) at a mean follow
up of 4.8 years (2.1 to 12.5) (p <
0.001). No patients reported
squeaking of the hip. There were two fractures of the ceramic head, both in alumina
bearings. No liners were seen to fracture. No fractures were observed
in components made of Delta ceramic. At 8.3 years post-operatively
the survival with any cause of failure as the endpoint was 96.6%
(95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7 to 99.3) for the acetabular component and
94.0% (95% CI 82.1 to 98.4) for the femoral component. The technique of revising the acetabular component in the presence
of a well-fixed femoral component with a ceramic head placed on
a titanium sleeve over the used trunnion is a useful adjunct in
revision hip practice. The use of Delta ceramic is recommended. Cite this article:
The direct anterior approach in total hip replacement anatomically offers the chance to minimise soft-tissue trauma because an intermuscular and internervous plane is explored. This motivated us to abandon our previously used transgluteal approach and to adopt the direct anterior approach for total hip replacement. Using MRI, we performed a retrospective comparative study of the direct anterior approach with the transgluteal approach. There were 25 patients in each group. At one year post-operatively all the patients underwent MRI of their replaced hips. A radiologist graded the changes in the soft-tissue signals in the abductor muscles. The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, body mass index, complexity of the reconstruction and absence of symptoms. Detachment of the abductor insertion, partial tears and tendonitis of gluteus medius and minimus, the presence of peri-trochanteric bursal fluid and fatty atrophy of gluteus medius and minimus were significantly less pronounced and less frequent when the direct anterior approach was used. There was no significant difference in the findings regarding tensor fascia lata between the two approaches. We conclude that use of the direct anterior approach results in a better soft-tissue response as assessed by MRI after total hip replacement. However, the impact on outcome needs to be evaluated further.
