Elective orthopaedic surgery was cancelled early in the COVID-19 pandemic and is currently running at significantly reduced capacity in most institutions. This has resulted in a significant backlog to treatment, with some hospitals projecting that waiting times for arthroplasty is three times the pre-COVID-19 duration. There is concern that the patient group requiring arthroplasty are often older and have more medical comorbidities—the same group of patients advised they are at higher risk of mortality from catching COVID-19. The aim of this study is to investigate the morbidity and mortality in elective patients operated on during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare this to a pre-pandemic cohort. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications, including nosocomial COVID-19 infection. These operations were performed in a district general hospital, with COVID-19 acute admissions in the same building. Our institution reinstated elective operations using a “Blue stream” pathway, which involves isolation before and after surgery, COVID-19 testing pre-admission, and separation of ward and theatre pathways for “blue” patients. A register of all arthroplasties was taken, and their clinical course and investigations recorded.Aims
Methods
Preoperative nasal All primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed from January 2006 to April 2018 were retrospectively reviewed for the incidence of early PJI. Demographic parameters, risk factors for PJI (American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, body mass index, smoking status, and diabetes mellitus) and implant types were collected. A preoperative screening and eradication protocol for nasal colonization of Aims
Methods
To calculate how the likelihood of obtaining measurable benefit from hip or knee arthroplasty varies with preoperative patient-reported scores. Existing UK data from 222,933 knee and 209,760 hip arthroplasty patients were used to model an individual’s probability of gaining meaningful improvement after surgery based on their preoperative Oxford Knee or Hip Score (OKS/OHS). A clinically meaningful improvement after arthroplasty was defined as ≥ 8 point improvement in OHS, and ≥ 7 in OKS.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a potential treatment
for isolated bone on bone osteoarthritis when limited to a single
compartment. The risk for revision of UKA is three times higher
than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this review was
to discuss the different revision options after UKA failure. A search was performed for English language articles published
between 2006 and 2016. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 105
papers were selected for further analysis. Of these, 39 papers were
deemed to contain clinically relevant data to be included in this review.Objectives
Materials and Methods
Infection is a leading indication for revision
arthroplasty. Established criteria used to diagnose prosthetic joint infection
(PJI) include a range of laboratory tests. Leucocyte esterase (LE)
is widely used on a colorimetric reagent strip for the diagnosis
of urinary tract infections. This inexpensive test may be used for
the diagnosis or exclusion of PJI. Aspirates from 30 total hip arthroplasties
(THAs) and 79 knee arthroplasties (KA) were analysed for LE activity. Semi-quantitative
reagent strip readings of 15, 70, 125 and 500 white blood cells
(WBC) were validated against a manual synovial white cell count
(WCC). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed
to determine the optimal cut-off point for the semi-quantitative
results. Based on established criteria, six THAs and 15 KAs were
classified as infected. The optimal cut-off point for the diagnosis
of PJI was 97 WBC. The closest semi-quantitative reading for a positive
result was 125 WBC, achieving a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity
of 93%. The positive and negative predictive values of the LE test
strip were 74% and 95% respectively. The LE reagent strip had a high specificity and negative predictive
value. A negative result may exclude PJI and negate the need for
further diagnostic tests. Cite this article:
