The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
The pre-operative differentiation between enchondroma,
low-grade chondrosarcoma and high-grade chondrosarcoma remains a
diagnostic challenge. We reviewed the accuracy and safety of the
radiological grading of cartilaginous tumours through the assessment
of, first, pre-operative radiological and post-operative histological agreement,
and second the rate of recurrence in lesions confirmed as high-grade
on histology. We performed a retrospective review of major long
bone cartilaginous tumours managed by curettage as low grade between
2001 and 2012. A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 47.6 years
(8 to 71) were included. There were 23 men and 30 women. The tumours
involved the femur (n = 20), humerus (n = 18), tibia (n = 9), fibula
(n = 3), radius (n = 2) and ulna (n = 1). Pre-operative diagnoses
resulted from multidisciplinary consensus following radiological
review alone for 35 tumours, or with the addition of pre-operative
image guided needle biopsy for 18. The histologically confirmed diagnosis
was enchondroma for two (3.7%), low-grade chondrosarcoma for 49
(92.6%) and high-grade chondrosarcoma for two (3.7%). Three patients
with a low-grade tumour developed a local recurrence at a mean of 15
months (12 to 17) post-operatively. A single high-grade recurrence
(grade II) was treated with tibial diaphyseal replacement. The overall
recurrence rate was 7.5% at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years (1.2 to
12.3). Cartilaginous tumours identified as low-grade on pre-operative
imaging with or without additional image-guided needle biopsy can
safely be managed as low-grade without pre-operative histological
diagnosis. A few tumours may demonstrate high-grade features histologically,
but the rates of recurrence are not affected. Cite this article:
