Adverse spinal motion or balance (spine mobility) and adverse pelvic mobility, in combination, are often referred to as adverse spinopelvic mobility (SPM). A stiff lumbar spine, large posterior standing pelvic tilt, and severe sagittal spinal deformity have been identified as risk factors for increased hip instability. Adverse SPM can create functional malposition of the acetabular components and hence is an instability risk. Adverse pelvic mobility is often, but not always, associated with abnormal spinal motion parameters. Dislocation rates for dual-mobility articulations (DMAs) have been reported to be between 0% and 1.1%. The aim of this study was to determine the early survivorship from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) of patients with adverse SPM who received a DMA. A multicentre study was performed using data from 227 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), enrolled consecutively. All the patients who had one or more adverse spine or pelvic mobility parameter had a DMA inserted at the time of their surgery. The mean age was 76 years (22 to 93) and 63% were female (n = 145). At a mean of 14 months (5 to 31) postoperatively, the AOANJRR was analyzed for follow-up information. Reasons for revision and types of revision were identified.Aims
Methods
The pelvis rotates in the sagittal plane during daily activities.
These rotations have a direct effect on the functional orientation
of the acetabulum. The aim of this study was to quantify changes
in pelvic tilt between different functional positions. Pre-operatively, pelvic tilt was measured in 1517 patients undergoing
total hip arthroplasty (THA) in three functional positions – supine,
standing and flexed seated (the moment when patients initiate rising
from a seated position). Supine pelvic tilt was measured from CT
scans, standing and flexed seated pelvic tilts were measured from standardised
lateral radiographs. Anterior pelvic tilt was assigned a positive
value.Aims
Patients and Methods
Long-term clinical outcomes for ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings
are encouraging. However, there is a risk of squeaking. Guidelines
for the orientation of the acetabular component are defined from
static imaging, but the position of the pelvis and thus the acetabular
component during activities associated with edge-loading are likely
to be very different from those measured when the patient is supine.
We assessed the functional orientation of the acetabular component. A total of 18 patients with reproducible squeaking in their CoC
hips during deep flexion were investigated with a control group
of 36 non-squeaking CoC hips. The two groups were matched for the
type of implant, the orientation of the acetabular component when
supine, the size of the femoral head, ligament laxity, maximum hip
flexion and body mass index. Aims
Patients and Methods
