Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA using a finite element model (FEM) validated experimentally by digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE). A total of ten composite tibias implanted with all-polyethylene (AP) and metal-backed (MB) tibial components were loaded to 2500 N. Cortical strain was measured using DIC and cancellous microdamage using AE. FEMs were created and validated and polyethylene thickness varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. The volume of cancellous bone exposed to < -3000 µε (pathological loading) and < -7000 µε (yield point) minimum principal (compressive) microstrain and > 3000 µε and > 7000 µε maximum principal (tensile) microstrain was computed.Objectives
Materials and Methods
Risk of revision following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is higher
in patients under 55 years, but little data are reported regarding
non-revision outcomes. This study aims to identify predictors of
dissatisfaction in these patients. We prospectively assessed 177 TKAs (157 consecutive patients,
99 women, mean age 50 years; 17 to 54) from 2008 to 2013. Age, gender,
implant, indication, body mass index (BMI), social deprivation,
range of movement, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade of osteoarthritis
(OA) and prior knee surgery were recorded. Pre- and post-operative
Oxford Knee Score (OKS) as well as Short Form-12 physical (PCS)
and mental component scores were obtained. Post-operative range
of movement, complications and satisfaction were measured at one
year.Aims
Patients and Methods
As many as 25% to 40% of unicompartmental knee
replacement (UKR) revisions are performed for pain, a possible cause
of which is proximal tibial strain. The aim of this study was to
examine the effect of UKR implant design and material on cortical
and cancellous proximal tibial strain in a synthetic bone model.
Composite Sawbone tibiae were implanted with cemented UKR components
of different designs, either all-polyethylene or metal-backed. The tibiae
were subsequently loaded in 500 N increments to 2500 N, unloading
between increments. Cortical surface strain was measured using a
digital image correlation technique. Cancellous damage was measured
using acoustic emission, an engineering technique that detects sonic
waves (‘hits’) produced when damage occurs in material. Anteromedial cortical surface strain showed significant differences
between implants at 1500 N and 2500 N in the proximal 10 mm only
(p <
0.001), with relative strain shielding in metal-backed implants.
Acoustic emission showed significant differences in cancellous bone
damage between implants at all loads (p = 0.001). All-polyethylene implants
displayed 16.6 times the total number of cumulative acoustic emission
hits as controls. All-polyethylene implants also displayed more
hits than controls at all loads (p <
0.001), more than metal-backed
implants at loads ≥ 1500 N (p <
0.001), and greater acoustic
emission activity on unloading than controls (p = 0.01), reflecting
a lack of implant stiffness. All-polyethylene implants were associated
with a significant increase in damage at the microscopic level compared
with metal-backed implants, even at low loads. All-polyethylene
implants should be used with caution in patients who are likely
to impose large loads across their knee joint. Cite this article:
This prospective randomised controlled double-blind
trial compared two types of PFC Sigma total knee replacement (TKR),
differing in three design features aimed at improving flexion. The
outcome of a standard fixed-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-preserving
design (FB-S) was compared with that of a high-flexion rotating-platform
posterior-stabilised design (RP-F) at one year after TKR. The study group of 77 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
comprised 37 men and 40 women, with a mean age of 69 years (44.9
to 84.9). The patients were randomly allocated either to the FB-S
or the RP-F group and assessed pre-operatively and at one year post-operatively.
The mean post-operative non-weight-bearing flexion was 107° (95%
confidence interval (CI) 104° to 110°)) for the FB-S group and 113°
(95% CI 109° to 117°) for the RP-F group, and this difference was
statistically significant (p = 0.032). However, weight-bearing range
of movement during both level walking and ascending a slope as measured
during flexible electrogoniometry was a mean of 4° lower in the RP-F
group than in the FB-S group, with 58° (95% CI 56° to 60°) Although the RP-F group achieved higher non-weight-bearing knee
flexion, patients in this group did not use this during activities
of daily living and reported more pain one year after surgery
Modifications in the design of knee replacements have been proposed in order to maximise flexion. We performed a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome, including maximum knee flexion, in patients receiving either a standard or a high flexion version of the NexGen legacy posterior stabilised total knee replacement. A total of 56 patients, half of whom received each design, were assessed pre-operatively and at one year after operation using knee scores and analysis of range of movement using electrogoniometry. For both implant designs there was a significant improvement in the function component of the knee scores (p <
0.001) and the maximum range of flexion when walking on the level, ascending and descending a slope or stairs (all p <
0.001), squatting (p = 0.020) and stepping into a bath (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in outcome, including the maximum knee flexion, between patients receiving the standard and high flexion designs of this implant.
