Lateral clavicular physeal injuries in adolescents
are frequently misinterpreted as acromioclavicular dislocations. There
are currently no clear guidelines for the management of these relatively
rare injuries. Non-operative treatment can result in a cosmetic
deformity, warranting resection of the non-remodelled original lateral
clavicle. However, fixation with Kirschner (K)-wires may be associated
with infection and/or prominent metalwork. We report our experience
with a small series of such cases. Between October 2008 and October 2011 five patients with lateral
clavicular physeal fractures (types III, IV and V) presented to
our unit. There were four boys and one girl with a mean age of 12.8
years (9 to 14). Four fractures were significantly displaced and
treated operatively using a tension band suture technique. One grade
III fracture was treated conservatively. The mean follow-up was
26 months (6 to 42). All patients made an uncomplicated recovery. The mean time to
discharge was three months. The QuickDASH score at follow-up was
0 for each patient. No patient developed subsequent growth disturbances. We advocate the surgical treatment of significantly displaced
Grade IV and V fractures to avoid cosmetic deformity. A tension
band suture technique avoids the problems of retained metalwork
and the need for a secondary procedure. Excellent clinical and radiological
results were seen in all our patients. Cite this article:
Replacement of the shoulder in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is not often performed and there have been no published series to date. We present nine glenohumeral hemiarthroplasties in eight patients with systemic or polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The mean follow-up was six years (59 to 89 months). The mean age at the time of surgery was 32 years. Surgery took place at a mean of 27 years after diagnosis. The results indicated excellent relief from pain. There was restoration of useful function which deteriorated with time, in part because of progression of the systemic disease in this severely affected group. No patient has required revision to date and there has been no radiological evidence of loosening or osteolysis around the implants. We discuss the pathoanatomical challenges unique to this group. There was very little space for a prosthetic joint and, in some cases, bony deformity and the small size necessitated the use of custom-made implants.
