Prolonged waits for hip and knee arthroplasty have raised questions about the equity of current approaches to waiting list prioritization for those awaiting surgery. We therefore set out to understand key stakeholder (patient and surgeon) preferences for the prioritization of patients awaiting such surgery, in order to guide future waiting list redesign. A combined qualitative/quantitative approach was used. This comprised a Delphi study to first inform which factors patients and surgeons designate as important for prioritization of patients on hip and knee arthroplasty waiting lists, followed by a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine how the factors should be weighed against each other. Coefficient values for each included DCE attribute were used to construct a ‘priority score’ (weighted benefit score) that could be used to rank individual patients waiting for surgery based on their respective characteristics.Aims
Methods
The extended wait that most patients are now experiencing for hip and knee arthroplasty has raised questions about whether reliance on waiting time as the primary driver for prioritization is ethical, and if other additional factors should be included in determining surgical priority. Our Prioritization of THose aWaiting hip and knee ArthroplastY (PATHWAY) project will explore which perioperative factors are important to consider when prioritizing those on the waiting list for hip and knee arthroplasty, and how these factors should be weighted. The final product will include a weighted benefit score that can be used to aid in surgical prioritization for those awaiting elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty. There will be two linked work packages focusing on opinion from key stakeholders (patients and surgeons). First, an online modified Delphi process to determine a consensus set of factors that should be involved in patient prioritization. This will be performed using standard Delphi methodology consisting of multiple rounds where following initial individual rating there is feedback, discussion, and further recommendations undertaken towards eventual consensus. The second stage will then consist of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) to allow for priority setting of the factors derived from the Delphi through elicitation of weighted benefit scores. The DCE consists of several choice tasks designed to elicit stakeholder preference regarding included attributes (factors).Aims
Methods
We studied the wear generated by motion between polished and shot-blasted titanium-alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) or cobalt-chrome alloy (Co-Cr) surfaces and cortical bone in vitro. Semicircular sections of human proximal femoral cortex were reamed to fit metal cylinders of each alloy. The cylinders were then fitted in the bone, loaded and rotated in physiological saline. Ti-alloy resulted in more wear both of the bone and of the metal than did Co-Cr alloy. Metal wear was reduced and bone wear was increased by shot-blasting, a procedure which introduces surface residual stresses and roughens the metal surface. We conclude that when there is gross motion between a metal implant and bone, Ti-alloy is likely to generate more wear debris than Co-Cr alloy. The least wear both of bone and of metal was produced by polished Co-Cr.
The correction of angular deformities of long bones by incomplete osteotomy, followed three weeks later by manual osteoclasis, overcomes the problem of secondary displacement sometimes seen after correction by complete osteotomy and makes internal fixation unnecessary. This paper presents an experience of twenty-six operations in eighteen patients. In all cases the deformity was corrected with excellent cosmetic and functional results. Complete bony union was achieved and there were no problems with displacement at the osteotomy site. Four cases are described in detail to illustrate use of the technique in different clinical situations.
