Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 5 | Pages 872 - 880
1 May 2021
Young PS Macarico DT Silverwood RK Farhan-Alanie OM Mohammed A Periasamy K Nicol A Meek RMD

Aims

Uncemented metal acetabular components show good osseointegration, but material stiffness causes stress shielding and retroacetabular bone loss. Cemented monoblock polyethylene components load more physiologically; however, the cement bone interface can suffer fibrous encapsulation and loosening. It was hypothesized that an uncemented titanium-sintered monoblock polyethylene component may offer the optimum combination of osseointegration and anatomical loading.

Methods

A total of 38 patients were prospectively enrolled and received an uncemented monoblock polyethylene acetabular (pressfit) component. This single cohort was then retrospectively compared with previously reported randomized cohorts of cemented monoblock (cemented) and trabecular metal (trabecular) acetabular implants. The primary outcome measure was periprosthetic bone density using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry over two years. Secondary outcomes included radiological and clinical analysis.