The outcome of repeat septic revision after a failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to report the infection-free and all-cause revision-free survival of repeat septic revision after a failed one-stage exchange, and to determine whether the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) stage is associated with subsequent infection-related failure. We retrospectively reviewed all repeat septic revision TKAs which were undertaken after a failed one-stage exchange between 2004 and 2017. A total of 33 repeat septic revisions (29 one-stage and four two-stage) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up from repeat septic revision was 68.2 months (8.0 months to 16.1 years). The proportion of patients who had a subsequent infection-related failure and all-cause revision was reported and Kaplan-Meier survival for these endpoints was determined. Patients were categorized according to the MSIS staging system, and the association with subsequent infection was analyzed.Aims
Methods
Knee arthrodesis is a potential salvage procedure
for limb preservation after failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due
to infection. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of single-stage
knee arthrodesis using an intramedullary cemented coupled nail without
bone-on-bone fusion after failed and infected TKA with extensor
mechanism deficiency. Between 2002 and 2012, 27 patients (ten female,
17 male; mean age 68.8 years; 52 to 87) were treated with septic
single-stage exchange. Mean follow-up duration was 67.1months (24
to 143, n = 27) (minimum follow-up 24 months) and for patients with
a minimum follow-up of five years 104.9 (65 to 143,; n = 13). A
subjective patient evaluation (Short Form (SF)-36) was obtained,
in addition to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The mean VAS score was
1.44 (SD 1.48). At final follow-up, four patients had recurrent
infections after arthrodesis (14.8%). Of these, three patients were
treated with a one-stage arthrodesis nail exchange; one of the three
patients had an aseptic loosening with a third single-stage exchange,
and one patient underwent knee amputation for uncontrolled sepsis at
108 months. All patients, including the amputee, indicated that
they would choose arthrodesis again. Data indicate that a single-stage
knee arthrodesis offers an acceptable salvage procedure after failed
and infected TKA. Cite this article:
The use of hinged implants in primary total knee
replacement (TKR) should be restricted to selected indications and mainly
for elderly patients. Potential indications for a rotating hinge
or pure hinge implant in primary TKR include: collateral ligament
insufficiency, severe varus or valgus deformity (>
20°) with necessary
relevant soft-tissue release, relevant bone loss including insertions
of collateral ligaments, gross flexion-extension gap imbalance,
ankylosis, or hyperlaxity. Although data reported in the literature
are inconsistent, clinical results depend on implant design, proper
technical use, and adequate indications. We present our experience
with a specific implant type that we have used for over 30 years
and which has given our elderly patients good mid-term results.
Because revision of implants with long cemented stems can be very
challenging, an effort should be made in the future to use shorter stems
in modular versions of hinged implants. Cite this article:
