This prospective study reports longitudinal, within-patient, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over a 15-year period following cemented single radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims included reporting PROMs trajectory, 15-year implant survival, and patient attrition from follow-up. From 2006 to 2007, 462 consecutive cemented cruciate-retaining Triathlon TKAs were implanted in 426 patients (mean age 69 years (21 to 89); 290 (62.7%) female). PROMs (12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and satisfaction) were assessed preoperatively and at one, five, ten, and 15 years. Kaplan-Meier survival and univariate analysis were performed.Aims
Methods
To identify variables independently associated with same-day discharge (SDD) of patients following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and to develop machine learning algorithms to predict suitable candidates for outpatient rTKA. Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Programme (ACS-NSQIP) database from the years 2018 to 2020. Patients with elective, unilateral rTKA procedures and a total hospital length of stay between zero and four days were included. Demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. A multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model and various machine learning techniques were compared using area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. Important and significant variables were identified from the models.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As revision of UKA may be less technically demanding than revision TKA, UKA patients with poor functional outcomes may be more likely to be offered revision than TKA patients with similar outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical thresholds for revisions between TKA and UKA using revision incidence and patient-reported outcomes, in a large, matched cohort at early, mid-, and late-term follow-up. Analyses were performed on propensity score-matched patient cohorts of TKAs and UKAs (2:1) registered in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 with an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) response at six months (n, TKA: 16,774; UKA: 8,387), five years (TKA: 6,718; UKA: 3,359), or ten years (TKA: 3,486; UKA: 1,743). Associations between OKS and revision within two years following the score were examined. Thresholds were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Reasons for aseptic revision were compared using cumulative incidence with competing risk.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to assess mapping models to predict the three-level version of EuroQoL five-dimension utility index (EQ-5D-3L) from the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and validate these before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients was used to create the prediction models, and a second cohort of 721 patients from a different centre was used to validate the models, all of whom underwent TKA. Patient characteristics, BMI, OKS, and EQ-5D-3L were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Generalized linear regression was used to formulate the prediction models.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a higher risk of revision than total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly for younger patients. The outcome of knee arthroplasty is typically defined as implant survival or revision incidence after a defined number of years. This can be difficult for patients to conceptualize. We aimed to calculate the ‘lifetime risk’ of revision for UKA as a more meaningful estimate of risk projection over a patient’s remaining lifetime, and to compare this to TKA. Incidence of revision and mortality for all primary UKAs performed from 1999 to 2019 (n = 13,481) was obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Lifetime risk of revision was calculated for patients and stratified by age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade.Aims
Methods
The success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually measured using functional outcome scores and revision-free survivorship. However, reporting the lifetime risk of revision may be more meaningful to patients when gauging risks, especially in younger patients. We aimed to assess the lifetime risk of revision for patients in different age categories at the time of undergoing primary TKA. The New Zealand Joint Registry database was used to obtain revision rates, mortality, and the indications for revision for all primary TKAs performed during an 18-year period between January 1999 and December 2016. Patients were stratified into age groups at the time of the initial TKA, and the lifetime risk of revision was calculated according to age, sex, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. The most common indications for revision were also analyzed for each age group.Aims
Methods
Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful procedure, about 20% of patients remain dissatisfied postoperatively. This proportion is derived from dichotomous models of the assessment of surgical success or failure, which may not reflect the spectrum of outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore differing responses to surgery, and assess whether there are distinct groups of patients with differing patterns of outcome. This was a secondary analysis of a UK multicentre TKA longitudinal cohort study. We used a group-based trajectory modelling analysis of Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in the first year following surgery with longitudinal data involving five different timepoints and multiple predictor variables. Associations between the derived trajectory groups and categorical baseline variables were assessed, and predictors of trajectory group membership were identified using Poisson regression and multinomial logistic regression, as appropriate. The final model was adjusted for sociodemographic factors (age, sex) and baseline OKS.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to develop a personalized outcome prediction tool, to be used with knee arthroplasty patients, that predicts outcomes (lengths of stay (LOS), 90 day readmission, and one-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on an individual basis and allows for dynamic modifiable risk factors. Data were prospectively collected on all patients who underwent total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a between July 2015 and June 2018. Cohort 1 (n = 5,958) was utilized to develop models for LOS and 90 day readmission. Cohort 2 (n = 2,391, surgery date 2015 to 2017) was utilized to develop models for one-year improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain score, KOOS function score, and KOOS quality of life (QOL) score. Model accuracies within the imputed data set were assessed through cross-validation with root mean square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the LOS and PROMs models, and the index of prediction accuracy (IPA), and area under the curve (AUC) for the readmission models. Model accuracies in new patient data sets were assessed with AUC.Aims
Methods
There are comparatively few randomized studies evaluating knee arthroplasty prostheses, and fewer still that report longer-term functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes of an existing implant trial cohort to document changing patient function over time following total knee arthroplasty using longitudinal analytical techniques and to determine whether implant design chosen at time of surgery influenced these outcomes. A mid-term follow-up of the remaining 125 patients from a randomized cohort of total knee arthroplasty patients (initially comprising 212 recruited patients), comparing modern (Triathlon) and traditional (Kinemax) prostheses was undertaken. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), knee range of movement, pain numerical rating scales, lower limb power output, timed functional assessment battery, and satisfaction survey. Data were linked to earlier assessment timepoints, and analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed models, incorporating longitudinal change over all assessment timepoints.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for prosthetic
joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The New Zealand Joint Registry database was analysed, using revision
surgery for PJI at six and 12 months after surgery as primary outcome
measures. Statistical associations between revision for infection,
with common and definable surgical and patient factors were tested.Aims
Patients and Methods
Instability is a common indication for early
revision after both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty
(TKA), accounting for up to 20% in the literature. The number of
TKAs performed annually continues to climb exponentially, thus having
an effective algorithm for treatment is essential. This relies on
a thorough pre- and intra-operative assessment of the patient. The
underlying cause of the instability must be identified initially
and subsequently, the surgeon must be able to balance the flexion
and extension gaps and be comfortable using a variety of constrained
implants. This review describes the assessment of the unstable TKA, and
the authors’ preferred form of treatment for these difficult cases
where the source of instability is often multifactorial. Cite this article:
Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs, a commonly used animal model of osteoarthritis,
were used to determine if high frequency ultrasound can ensure intra-articular
injections are accurately positioned in the knee joint. A high-resolution small animal ultrasound system with a 40 MHz
transducer was used for image-guided injections. A total of 36 guinea
pigs were anaesthetised with isoflurane and placed on a heated stage.
Sterile needles were inserted directly into the knee joint medially,
while the transducer was placed on the lateral surface, allowing
the femur, tibia and fat pad to be visualised in the images. B-mode
cine loops were acquired during 100 µl. We assessed our ability
to visualise 1) important anatomical landmarks, 2) the needle and
3) anatomical changes due to the injection. Objective
Methods
Although the vast majority of patients that undergo
total knee replacement have satisfactory outcomes with a generally
low complication rate, occasionally a patient will be encountered
that has had multiple failed surgeries, and now reaches a crossroad
as to whether limb salvage will be acceptable or not. Cite this article:
The aim of this prospective multicentre study
was to report the patient satisfaction after total knee replacement (TKR),
undertaken with the aid of intra-operative sensors, and to compare
these results with previous studies. A total of 135 patients undergoing
TKR were included in the study. The soft-tissue balance of each
TKR was quantified intra-operatively by the sensor, and 18 (13%)
were found to be unbalanced. A total of 113 patients (96.7%) in
the balanced group and 15 (82.1%) in the unbalanced group were satisfied
or very satisfied one year post-operatively (p = 0.043). A review of the literature identified no previous study with
a mean level of satisfaction that was greater than the reported
level of satisfaction of the balanced TKR group in this study. Ensuring
soft-tissue balance by using intra-operative sensors during TKR
may improve satisfaction. Cite this article:
We have previously reported the short-term radiological
results of a randomised controlled trial comparing kinematically
aligned total knee replacement (TKR) and mechanically aligned TKR,
along with early pain and function scores. In this study we report
the two-year clinical results from this trial. A total of 88 patients
(88 knees) were randomly allocated to undergo either kinematically
aligned TKR using patient-specific guides, or mechanically aligned
TKR using conventional instruments. They were analysed on an intention-to-treat
basis. The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the
method of alignment. At a minimum of two years, all outcomes were better for the kinematically
aligned group, as determined by the mean Oxford knee score (40 (15
to 48) In this study, the use of a kinematic alignment technique performed
with patient-specific guides provided better pain relief and restored
better function and range of movement than the mechanical alignment
technique performed with conventional instruments. Cite this article:
We studied the bone mineral density (BMD) and
the bone mineral content (BMC) of the proximal tibia in patients with
a well-functioning uncemented Oxford medial compartment arthroplasty
using the Lunar iDXA bone densitometer. Our hypothesis was that
there would be decreased BMD and BMC adjacent to the tibial base
plate and increased BMD and BMC at the tip of the keel. There were 79 consecutive patients (33 men, 46 women) with a
mean age of 65 years (44 to 84) with a minimum two-year follow-up
(mean 2.6 years (2.0 to 5.0)) after unilateral arthroplasty, who
were scanned using a validated standard protocol where seven regions
of interest (ROI) were examined and compared with the contralateral
normal knee. All had well-functioning knees with a mean Oxford knee
score of 43 (14 to 48) and mean Knee Society function score of 90
(20 to 100), showing a correlation with the increasing scores and
higher BMC and BMD values in ROI 2 in the non-implanted knee relative
to the implanted knee (p = 0.013 and p = 0.015, respectively). The absolute and percentage changes in BMD and BMC were decreased
in all ROIs in the implanted knee compared with the non-implanted
knee, but this did not reach statistical significance. Bone loss
was markedly less than reported losses with total knee replacement. There was no significant association with side, although there
was a tendency for the BMC to decrease with age in men. The BMC
was less in the implanted side relative to the non-implanted side
in men compared with women in ROI 2 (p = 0.027), ROI 3 (p = 0.049)
and ROI 4 (p = 0.029). The uncemented Oxford medial compartment arthroplasty appears
to allow relative preservation of the BMC and BMD of the proximal
tibia, suggesting that the implant acts more physiologically than
total knee replacement. Peri-prosthetic bone loss is an important
factor in assessing long-term implant stability and survival, and
the results of this study are encouraging for the long-term outcome
of this arthroplasty. Cite this article:
The Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
(OUKR) was developed to address problems related to cementation,
and has been demonstrated in a randomised study to have similar
clinical outcomes with fewer radiolucencies than observed with the
cemented device. However, before its widespread use it is necessary
to clarify contraindications and assess the complications. This
requires a larger study than any previously published. We present a prospective multicentre series of 1000 cementless
OUKRs in 881 patients at a minimum follow-up of one year. All patients
had radiological assessment aligned to the bone–implant interfaces
and clinical scores. Analysis was performed at a mean of 38.2 months
(19 to 88) following surgery. A total of 17 patients died (comprising
19 knees (1.9%)), none as a result of surgery; there were no tibial
or femoral loosenings. A total of 19 knees (1.9%) had significant
implant-related complications or required revision. Implant survival
at six years was 97.2%, and there was a partial radiolucency at
the bone–implant interface in 72 knees (8.9%), with no complete radiolucencies.
There was no significant increase in complication rate compared
with cemented fixation (p = 0.87), and no specific contraindications
to cementless fixation were identified. Cementless OUKR appears to be safe and reproducible in patients
with end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, with radiological
evidence of improved fixation compared with previous reports using
cemented fixation. Cite this article:
We carried out a prospective investigation into
the radiological outcomes of uncemented Oxford medial compartment
unicondylar replacement in 220 consecutive patients (231 knees)
performed in a single centre with a minimum two-year follow-up.
The functional outcomes using the mean Oxford knee score and the
mean high-activity arthroplasty score were significantly improved
over the pre-operative scores (p <
0.001). There were 196 patients
with a two-year radiological examination performed under fluoroscopic
guidance, aiming to provide images acceptable for analysis of the
bone–implant interface. Of the six tibial zones examined on each
knee on the anteroposterior radiograph, only three had a partial
radiolucent line. All were in the medial aspect of the tibial base plate
(zone 1) and all measured <
1 mm. All of these patients were
asymptomatic. There were no radiolucent lines seen around the femoral
component or on the lateral view. There was one revision for loosening
at one year due to initial inadequate seating of the tibial component.
These results confirm that the early uncemented Oxford medial unicompartmental
compartmental knee replacements were reliable and the incidence
of radiolucent lines was significantly decreased compared with the
reported results of cemented versions of this implant. These independent
results confirm those of the designing centre.
We reviewed the rate of revision of unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) from the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2008. There were 4284 UKRs, of which 236 required revision, 205 to a total knee replacement (U2T) and 31 to a further unicompartmental knee replacement (U2U). We used these data to establish whether the survival and functional outcome for revised UKRs were comparable with those of primary total knee replacement (TKR). The rate of revision for the U2T cohort was four times higher than that for a primary TKR (1.97 The poor outcome of a UKR converted to a primary TKR compared with a primary TKR should contra-indicate the use of a UKR as a more conservative procedure in the younger patient.
