Endoprosthetic reconstruction following distal femur tumour resection has been widely advocated. In this paper, we present the design of an uncemented endoprosthesis system featuring a short, curved stem, with the goal of enhancing long-term survivorship and functional outcomes. This study involved patients who underwent implantation of an uncemented distal femoral endoprosthesis with a short and curved stem between 2014 and 2019. Functional outcomes were assessed using the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS-93) score. Additionally, we quantified five types of complications and assessed osseointegration radiologically. The survivorship of the endoprosthesis was evaluated according to two endpoints. A total of 134 patients with a median age of 26 years (IQR 16 to 41) were included in our study. The median follow-up time was 61 months (IQR 56 to 76), and the median functional MSTS-93 was 83% (IQR 73 to 91) postoperatively.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed modular prostheses in patients who underwent joint-sparing limb salvage surgery (JSLSS) for malignant femoral diaphyseal bone tumours. We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients (13 males and four females) with femoral diaphyseal tumours who underwent JSLSS in our hospital.Aims
Methods
Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. We retrospectively reviewed 209 consecutive patients who, between 1991 and 2016, had undergone resection of the distal femur for tumour and reconstruction using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. The study endpoint was failure of the prosthesis, defined as removal of the femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; major revision (exchange of the femoral component, tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or amputation.Aims
Methods
Pelvic reconstruction after the resection of a tumour around
the acetabulum is a challenging procedure due to the complex anatomy
and biomechanics. Several pelvic endoprostheses have been introduced,
but the rates of complication remain high. Our aim was to review
the use of a stemmed acetabular pedestal cup in the management of
these patients. The study involved 48 patients who underwent periacetabular reconstruction
using a stemmed pedestal cup (Schoellner cup; Zimmer Biomet Inc.,
Warsaw, Indiana) between 2000 and 2013. The indications for treatment included
a primary bone tumour in 27 patients and metastatic disease in 21
patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was
52 years (16 to 83).Aims
Patients and Methods
Massive endoprostheses rely on extra-cortical bone bridging (ECBB)
to enhance fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the
role of selective laser sintered (SLS) porous collars in augmenting
the osseointegration of these prostheses. The two novel designs of porous SLS collars, one with small pores
(Ø700 μm, SP) and one with large pores (Ø1500 μm, LP), were compared
in an ovine tibial diaphyseal model. Osseointegration of these collars
was compared with that of a clinically used solid, grooved design
(G). At six months post-operatively, the ovine tibias were retrieved and
underwent radiological and histological analysis.Aims
Materials and Methods
Giant cell tumour is the most common aggressive
benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system and has a high rate of
local recurrence. When it occurs in proximity to the hip, reconstruction
of the joint is a challenge. Options for reconstruction after wide
resection include the use of a megaprosthesis or an allograft-prosthesis
composite. We performed a clinical and radiological study to evaluate
the functional results of a proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis
composite in the treatment of proximal femoral giant cell tumour
after wide resection. This was an observational study, between 2006
and 2012, of 18 patients with a mean age of 32 years (28 to 42)
and a mean follow-up of 54 months (18 to 79). We achieved excellent
outcomes using Harris Hip Score in 13 patients and a good outcome
in five. All allografts united. There were no complications such
as infection, failure, fracture or resorption of the graft, or recurrent
tumour. Resection and reconstruction of giant cell tumours with
proximal femoral allograft–prosthesis composite is a better option
than using a prosthesis considering preservation of bone stock and excellent
restoration of function. A good result requires demanding bone banking techniques, effective
measures to prevent infection and stability at the allograft-host
junction. Cite this article:
We have reviewed five adult patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic lesions. The patients had a mean age of 33.4 years (20 to 60) at the time of surgery and the mean follow-up was 7.6 years (0.8 to 16). Following surgery, all elbows were clinically stable and there was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis. Evaluation of function was assessed clinically and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, achieving a mean of 86% (70 to 100). Results at medium-term follow-up are encouraging with regards to elbow stability, implant survivorship and functional outcome.
Endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of 31 tumours of the proximal femur in 30 patients was performed using a Wagner SL femoral revision stem. The mean follow-up was 25.6 months (0.6 to 130.0). Of the 28 patients with a metastasis, 27 died within a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months (0.6 to 56.3) after the operation, and the remaining patient was excluded from the study 44.4 months post-operatively when the stem was removed. The two patients with primary bone tumours were still alive at the latest follow-up of 81.0 and 130.0 months, respectively. One stem only was removed for suspected low-grade infection 44.4 months post-operatively. The worst-case survival rate with removal of the stem for any cause and/or loss to follow-up was 80.0% (95% confidence interval 44.9 to 100) at 130.0 months. The mean Karnofsky index increased from 44.2% (20% to 70%) pre-operatively to 59.7% (0% to 100%) post-operatively, and the mean Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 4.5 (0 to 15) to 12.0 (0 to 18). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 62.4% (3.3% to 100%). The Wagner SL femoral revision stem offers an alternative to special tumour prostheses for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the proximal femur. The mid-term results are very promising, but long-term experience is necessary.
