Varus-valgus constrained (VVC) implants are often used during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to gain coronal plane stability. However, the increased mechanical torque applied to the bone-cement interface theoretically increases the risk of aseptic loosening. We assessed mid-term survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes of a fixed-bearing VVC device in revision TKAs. A total of 416 consecutive revision TKAs (398 patients) were performed at our institution using a single fixed-bearing VVC TKA from 2007 to 2015. Mean age was 64 years (33 to 88) with 50% male (199). Index revision TKA diagnoses were: instability (n = 122, 29%), aseptic loosening (n = 105, 25%), and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 97, 23%). All devices were cemented on the epiphyseal surfaces. Femoral stems were used in 97% (n = 402) of cases, tibial stems in 95% (n = 394) of cases; all were cemented. In total, 93% (n = 389) of cases required a stemmed femoral and tibial component. Femoral cones were used in 29%, and tibial cones in 40%. Survivorship was assessed via competing risk analysis; clinical outcomes were determined using Knee Society Scores (KSSs) and range of movement (ROM). Mean follow-up was four years (2 to 10).Aims
Methods
It has been suggested that mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) might lead to better outcomes by accommodating some femorotibial
rotational mismatch, thereby reducing contact stresses and polyethylene
wear. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a
difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing versions of a contemporary
TKA with respect to durability, range of movement (ROM) and function,
ten years postoperatively. A total of 240 patients who were enrolled in this randomized
controlled trial (RCT) underwent a primary cemented TKA with one
of three tibial components (all-polyethylene fixed-bearing, modular
metal-backed fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing). Patients were reviewed
at a median follow-up of ten years (IQR 9.2 to 10.4).Aims
Patients and Methods
