The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to review a large cohort of patients
and further assess the correlation between the histological response
to chemotherapy in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma with the overall
(OS) and event-free survival (EFS). All patients treated for Ewing’s sarcoma between 1980 and 2012
were reviewed. Of these, 293 patients without metastases at the
time of diagnosis and treated with chemotherapy and surgery were
included. Patients were grouped according to the percentage of necrosis
after chemotherapy: Group I: 0% to 50%, Group II: 51% to 99% and Group
III: 100%.Aims
Patients and Methods
Osteosarcoma of the pelvis is a particularly difficult tumour
to treat as it often presents late, may be of considerable size
and/or associated with metastases when it presents, and is frequently
chondroid in origin and resistant to chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to review our experience of managing
this group of patients and to identify features predictive of a
poor outcome. Between 1983 and 2014, 121 patients, (74 females and 47 males)
were treated at a single hospital: 74 (61.2%) patients had a primary
osteosarcoma and 47 (38.8%) had an osteosarcoma which was secondary
either to Paget’s disease (22; 18.2%) or to previous pelvic irradiation
(25; 20.7%). The mean age of those with a primary osteosarcoma was 29.3 years
(nine to 76) and their mean follow-up 2.9 years (0 to 29). The mean
age of those with a secondary sarcoma was 61.9 years (15 to 85)
and their mean follow-up was one year (0 to 14). A total of 22 patients with a primary sarcoma (52.4%) and 20
of those with a secondary sarcoma (47.6%) had metastases at the
time of presentation. Aims
Patients and Methods
A poor response to chemotherapy (≤ 90% necrosis)
for osteosarcomas leads to poorer survival and an increased risk of
local recurrence, particularly if there is a close margin of excision.
We evaluated whether amputation confers any survival benefit over
limb salvage surgery (LSS) with narrow margins in patients who respond
poorly to chemotherapy. We only analysed patients with an osteosarcoma of the limb, a
poor response to chemotherapy and close margins on LSS (marginal/intralesional)
or primary amputation: 360 patients (36 LSS (intralesional margins),
197 LSS (marginal margins) and 127 amputations) were included. Local
recurrence developed in 13 (36%) following LSS with intralesional
margins, and 39 (20%) following LSS with marginal margins. There
was no local recurrence in patients who underwent amputation. The
five-year survival for all patients was 41% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 35 to 46), but for those treated by LSS with marginal margins
was 46.2% (95% CI 38 to 53), 36.3% (95% CI 27 to 45) for those treated
by amputation, and 28% (95 CI 14 to 44) for those treated by LSS
with intralesional margins. Patients who had LSS and then developed
local recurrence as a first event had the same survival as those
who had primary amputation without local recurrence. Prophylactic
adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 40 patients but had no discernible
effect in preventing local recurrence. Although amputation offered better local control, it conferred
no clear survival benefit over LSS with marginal margins in these
patients with a poor overall prognosis. Cite this article:
Bone sarcomas are rare cancers and orthopaedic
surgeons come across them infrequently, sometimes unexpectedly during
surgical procedures. We investigated the outcomes of patients who
underwent a surgical procedure where sarcomas were found unexpectedly
and were subsequently referred to our unit for treatment. We identified
95 patients (44 intra-lesional excisions, 35 fracture fixations,
16 joint replacements) with mean age of 48 years (11 to 83); 60%
were males (n = 57). Local recurrence arose in 40% who underwent
limb salvage surgery Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to determine whether
the level of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) before treatment predicted
overall disease-specific survival and local tumour control in patients
with a sarcoma of bone. We retrospectively reviewed 318 patients who presented with a
primary sarcoma of bone between 2003 and 2010. Those who presented
with metastases and/or local recurrence were excluded. Elevated CRP levels were seen in 84 patients before treatment;
these patients had a poorer disease-specific survival (57% at five
years) than patients with a normal CRP (79% at five years) (p <
0.0001). They were also less likely to be free of recurrence (71%
at five years) than patients with a normal CRP (79% at five years)
(p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed the pre-operative CRP level
to be an independent predictor of survival and local control. Patients
with a Ewing’s sarcoma or chondrosarcoma who had an elevated CRP
before their treatment started had a significantly poorer disease-specific
survival than patients with a normal CRP (p = 0.02 and p <
0.0001, respectively).
Patients with a conventional osteosarcoma and a raised CRP were
at an increased risk of poorer local control. We recommend that CRP levels are measured routinely in patients
with a suspected sarcoma of bone as a further prognostic indicator
of survival. Cite this article:
