The purpose of this study is to examine six types of bearing surfaces implanted at a single institution over three decades to determine whether the reasons for revision vary among the groups and how long it takes to identify differences in survival. We considered six cohorts that included a total of 1,707 primary hips done between 1982 and 2010. These included 223 conventional polyethylene sterilized with γ irradiation in air (CPE-GA), 114 conventional polyethylene sterilized with gas plasma (CPE-GP), 116 crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE), 1,083 metal-on-metal (MOM), 90 ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), and 81 surface arthroplasties (SAs). With the exception of the COC, all other groups used cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral heads. The mean follow-up was 10 (0.008 to 35) years. Descriptive statistics with revisions per 100 component years (re/100 yr) and survival analysis with revision for any reason as the endpoint were used to compare bearing surfaces.Aims
Methods
The custom triflange is a patient-specific implant
for the treatment of severe bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty
(THA). Through a process of three-dimensional modelling and prototyping,
a hydroxyapatite-coated component is created for acetabular reconstruction.
There are seven level IV studies describing the clinical results
of triflange components. The most common complications include dislocation
and infection, although the rates of implant removal are low. Clinical
results are promising given the challenging problem. We describe
the design, manufacture and implantation process and review the
clinical results, contrasting them to other methods of acetabular
reconstruction in revision THA. Cite this article:
