The epiphyseal approach to a chondroblastoma of the intercondylar notch of a child’s distal femur does not provide adequate exposure, thereby necessitating the removal of a substantial amount of unaffected bone to expose the lesion. In this study, we compared the functional outcomes, local recurrence, and surgical complications of treating a chondroblastoma of the distal femoral epiphysis by either an intercondylar or an epiphyseal approach. A total of 30 children with a chondroblastoma of the distal femur who had been treated by intraregional curettage and bone grafting were retrospectively reviewed. An intercondylar approach was used in 16 patients (group A) and an epiphyseal approach in 14 (group B). Limb function was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and Sailhan’s functional criteria.Aims
Methods
We investigated the functional outcome in patients
who underwent reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) after removal of
a tumour of the proximal humerus. A total of 16 patients (ten women
and six men) underwent this procedure between 1998 and 2011 in our
hospital. Five patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Ten
patients were available for review at a mean follow-up of 46 months
(12 to 136). Eight patients had a primary and two patients a secondary
bone tumour. At final follow up the mean range of active movement was: abduction
78° (30° to 150°); flexion 98° (45° to 180°); external rotation
32° (10° to 60°); internal rotation 51° (10° to 80°). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 77% (60% to 90%) and the mean Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score was 70% (30% to 91%). Two patients had a superficial
infection and one had a deep infection and underwent a two-stage
revision procedure. In two patients there was loosening of the RSR;
one dislocated twice. All patients had some degree of atrophy or
pseudo-atrophy of the deltoid muscle. Use of a RSR in patients with a tumour of the proximal humerus
gives acceptable results. Cite this article:
Several techniques have been described to reconstruct a mobile wrist joint after resection of the distal radius for tumour. We reviewed our experience of using an osteo-articular allograft to do this in 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.9 months (28 to 119). The mean range of movement at the wrist was 56° flexion, 58° extension, 84° supination and 80° pronation. The mean ISOLS-MSTS score was 86% (63% to 97%) and the mean patient-rated wrist evaluation score was 16.5 (3 to 34). There was no local recurrence or distant metastases. The procedure failed in one patient with a fracture of the graft and an arthrodesis was finally required. Union was achieved at the host-graft interface in all except two cases. No patient reported more than modest non-disabling pain and six reported no pain at all. Radiographs showed early degenerative changes at the radiocarpal joint in every patient. A functional pain-free wrist can be restored with an osteo-articular allograft after resection of the distal radius for bone tumour, thereby avoiding the donor site morbidity associated with an autograft. These results may deteriorate with time.
