Patients undergoing femoral lengthening by external fixation
tolerate treatment less well when compared to tibial lengthening.
Lengthening of the femur with an intramedullary device may have
advantages. We reviewed all cases of simple femoral lengthening performed
at our unit from 2009 to 2014. Cases of nonunions, concurrent deformities,
congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip
were excluded, leaving 33 cases (in 22 patients; 11 patients had
bilateral procedures) for review. Healing index, implant tolerance
and complications were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods
Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure. Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion. Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.
Although gradual bone transport may permit the
restoration of large-diameter bones, complications are common owing
to the long duration of external fixation. In order to reduce such
complications, a new technique of bone transport involving the use
of an external fixator and a locking plate was devised for segmental
tibial bone defects. A total of ten patients (nine men, one woman) with a mean age
at operation of 40.4 years (16 to 64) underwent distraction osteogenesis
with a locking plate to treat previously infected post-traumatic
segmental tibial defects. The locking plate was fixed percutaneously
to bridge proximal and distal segments, and was followed by external fixation.
After docking, percutaneous screws were fixed at the transported
segment through plate holes. At the same time, bone grafting was
performed at the docking site with the external fixator removed. The mean defect size was 5.9 cm (3.8 to 9.3) and mean external
fixation index was
13.4 days/cm (11.8 to 19.5). In all cases, primary union of the
docking site and distraction callus was achieved, with an excellent
bony result. There was no recurrence of deep infection or osteomyelitis,
and with the exception of one patient with a pre-existing peroneal
nerve injury, all achieved an excellent or good functional result. With short external fixation times and low complication rates,
bone transport with a locking plate could be recommended for patients
with segmental tibial defects. Cite this article: