Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing was introduced into clinical
practice because it was perceived to be a better alternative to
conventional total hip replacement for young and active patients.
However, an increasing number of reports of complications have arisen
focusing on design and orientation of the components, the generation
of metallic wear particles and serum levels of metallic ions. The
procedure introduced a combination of two elements: large-dimension
components and hard abrasive particles of metal wear. The objective
of our study was to investigate the theory that microseparation
of the articular surfaces draws in a high volume of bursal fluid
and its contents into the articulation, and at relocation under
load would generate high pressures of fluid ejection, resulting
in an abrasive water jet. This theoretical concept using MoM resurfacing components (head
diameter 55 mm) was modelled mathematically and confirmed experimentally
using a material-testing machine that pushed the head into the cup
at a rate of 1000 mm/min until fully engaged.Objectives
Methods
Aims. Fretting and corrosion at the modular head/neck junction, known
as trunnionosis, in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a cause of adverse
reaction to metal debris (ARMD). We describe the outcome of revision
of metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA for ARMD due to trunnionosis
with emphasis on the risk of major complications. Patients and Methods. A total of 36 patients with a MoP THA who underwent revision
for ARMD due to trunnionosis were identified. Three were excluded
as their revision had been to another metal head. The remaining
33 were revised to a ceramic head with a titanium sleeve. We describe
the presentation, revision findings, and risk of complications in
these patients. Results. The patients presented with pain, swelling, stiffness, or instability
and an inflammatory mass was confirmed radiologically. Macroscopic
material deposition on the trunnion was seen in all patients, associated
with ARMD. Following revision, six (18.2%) dislocated, requiring
further revision in four. Three (9.1%) developed a deep infection and
six (18.2%) had significant persistent pain without an obvious cause.
One developed a femoral artery thrombosis after excision of an iliofemoral
pseudotumor, requiring a thrombectomy. Conclusion. The risk of serious complications following revision MoP THA
for ARMD associated with trunnionosis is high. In the presence of
extensive
This study aims to assess the relationship between history of pseudotumour formation secondary to metal-on-metal (MoM) implants and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate, as well as establish ESR and CRP thresholds that are suggestive of infection in these patients. We hypothesized that patients with a pseudotumour were at increased risk of infection. A total of 1,171 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with MoM articulations from August 2000 to March 2014 were retrospectively identified. Of those, 328 patients underwent metal artefact reduction sequence MRI and had minimum two years’ clinical follow-up, and met our inclusion criteria. Data collected included demographic details, surgical indication, laterality, implants used, history of pseudotumour, and their corresponding preoperative ESR (mm/hr) and CRP (mg/dl) levels. Multivariate logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate PJI and history of pseudotumour, and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to assess the diagnostic capabilities of ESR and CRP to determine the presence of infection in patients undergoing revision surgery.Aims
Methods
Surgical treatment of young femoral neck fractures often requires an open approach to achieve an anatomical reduction. The application of a calcar plate has recently been described to aid in femoral neck fracture reduction and to augment fixation. However, application of a plate may potentially compromise the regional vascularity of the femoral head and neck. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of calcar femoral neck plating on the vascularity of the femoral head and neck. A Hueter approach and capsulotomy were performed bilaterally in six cadaveric hips. In the experimental group, a one-third tubular plate was secured to the inferomedial femoral neck at 6:00 on the clockface. The contralateral hip served as a control with surgical approach and capsulotomy without fixation. Pre- and post-contrast MRI was then performed to quantify signal intensity in the femoral head and neck. Qualitative assessment of the terminal arterial branches to the femoral head, specifically the inferior retinacular artery (IRA), was also performed.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) combined with tranexamic acid (TXA) on blood loss and inflammatory responses after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to investigate the influence of different administration methods of CSS on perioperative blood loss during THA. This study is a randomized controlled trial involving 200 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA. A total of 200 patients treated with intravenous TXA were randomly assigned to group A (combined intravenous and topical CSS), group B (topical CSS), group C (intravenous CSS), or group D (placebo).Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a direct superior approach (DSA) with a matched group of patients undergoing THA by the same surgeon, using a posterolateral approach (PLA). This was a retrospective single surgeon study comparing the first 100 consecutive DSA THA patients with a matched group of patients using a standard PLA. Case notes were examined for patient demographics, length of hospital stay, operating time, intra- and postoperative complications, pain score, satisfaction score, and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Leg length discrepancy and component positioning were measured from postoperative plain radiographs.Aims
Methods
Previous studies have evidenced cement-in-cement techniques as reliable in revision arthroplasty. Commonly, the original cement mantle is reshaped, aiding accurate placement of the new stem. Ultrasonic devices selectively remove cement, preserve host bone, and have lower cortical perforation rates than other techniques. As far as the authors are aware, the impact of ultrasonic devices on final cement-in-cement bonds has not been investigated. This study assessed the impact of cement removal using the Orthosonics System for Cemented Arthroplasty Revision (OSCAR; Orthosonics) on final cement-in-cement bonds. A total of 24 specimens were manufactured by pouring cement (Simplex P Bone Cement; Stryker) into stainless steel moulds, with a central rod polished to Stryker Exeter V40 specifications. After cement curing, the rods were removed and eight specimens were allocated to each of three internal surface preparation groups: 1) burr; 2) OSCAR; and 3) no treatment. Internal holes were recemented, and each specimen was cut into 5 mm discs. Shear testing of discs was completed by a technician blinded to the original grouping, recording ultimate shear strengths. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was completed, inspecting surfaces of shear-tested specimens.Objectives
Methods
To present a surgically relevant update of trunnionosis. Systematic review performed April 2017.Aims
Materials and Methods
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and requires a battery of tests and clinical findings. The purpose of this review is to summarize all current evidence for common and new serum biomarkers utilized in the diagnosis of PJI. We searched two literature databases, using terms that encompass all hip and knee arthroplasty procedures, as well as PJI and statistical terms reflecting diagnostic parameters. The findings are summarized as a narrative review.Objectives
Methods
To determine ten-year failure rates following 36 mm metal-on-metal
(MoM) Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty (THA), and identify predictors
of failure. We retrospectively assessed a single-centre cohort of 569 primary
36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs (all Corail stems) followed up since 2012
according to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency
recommendations. All-cause failure rates (all-cause revision, and
non-revised cross-sectional imaging failures) were calculated, with predictors
for failure identified using multivariable Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study aimed to characterise and qualitatively grade the severity of the corrosion particles released into the hip joint following taper corrosion. The 26 cases examined were CoC/ABG Modular (n = 13) and ASR/SROM (n = 13). Blood serum metal ion levels were collected before and after revision surgery. The haematoxylin and eosin tissue sections were graded on the presence of fibrin exudates, necrosis, inflammatory cells and corrosion products. The corrosion products were identified based on visible observation and graded on abundance. Two independent observers blinded to the clinical patient findings scored all cases. Elemental analysis was performed on corrosion products within tissue sections. X-Ray diffraction was used to identify crystalline structures present in taper debris.Objectives
Methods
We compared the incidence of pseudotumours after
large head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) with
that after conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA and assessed
the predisposing factors to pseudotumour formation. From a previous randomised controlled trial which compared large
head (38 mm to 60 mm) cementless MoM THA with conventional head
(28 mm) cementless MoP THA, 93 patients (96 THAs: 41 MoM (21 males,
20 females, mean age of 64 years, standard deviation ( The incidence of pseudotumours, measured using a standardised
CT protocol was 22 (53.7%) after MoM THA and 12 (21.8%) after MoP
THA. Women with a MoM THA were more likely to develop a pseudotumour
than those with a MoP THA (15 Contrary to popular belief, pseudotumours occur frequently around
MoP THAs. Women with a MoM THA and an elevated cobalt level are
at greatest risk. In this study, pseudotumours had no effect on
the functional outcome after either large head MoM or conventional
MoP THA. Cite this article:
This conversation represents an attempt by several
arthroplasty surgeons to critique several abstracts presented over
the last year as well as to use them as a jumping off point for trying
to figure out where they fit in into our current understanding of
multiple issues in modern hip and knee arthroplasty.
The aims of this study were to compare the diagnostic test characteristics
of ultrasound alone, metal artefact reduction sequence MRI (MARS-MRI)
alone, and ultrasound combined with MARS-MRI for identifying intra-operative
pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) patients
undergoing revision surgery. This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study involved 39 patients
(40 MoMHRs). The time between imaging modalities was a mean of 14.6
days (0 to 90), with imaging performed at a mean of 5.3 months (0.06
to 12) before revision. The prevalence of intra-operative pseudotumours
was 82.5% (n = 33).Aims
Methods
Only limited data are available regarding the
infiltration of local anaesthetic for total hip arthroplasty (THA),
and no studies were performed for THA using the anterior approach. In this prospective, randomised placebo-controlled study we investigated
the effect of both standard and reverse infiltration of local anaesthetic
in combination with the anterior approach for THA. The primary endpoint
was the mean numeric rating score for pain four hours post-operatively.
In addition, we recorded the length of hospital stay, the operating
time, the destination of the patient at discharge, the use of pain
medication, the occurrence of side effects and pain scores at various
times post-operatively. Between November 2012 and January 2014, 75 patients were included
in the study. They were randomised into three groups: standard infiltration
of local anaesthetic, reversed infiltration of local anaesthetic,
and placebo. There was no difference in mean numeric rating score
for pain four hours post-operatively (p = 0.87). There were significantly
more side effects at one and eight hours post-operatively in the
placebo group (p = 0.02; p = 0.03), but this did not influence the
mobilisation of the patients. There were no differences in all other
outcomes between the groups. We found no clinically relevant effect when the infiltration
of local anaesthetic with ropivacaine and epinephrine was used in
a multimodal pain protocol for THA using the anterior approach. Cite this article:
Surface hip replacement (SHR) is generally used
in younger, active patients as an alternative conventional total
hip replacement in part because of the ability to preserve femoral
bone. This major benefit of surface replacement will only hold true
if revision procedures of SHRs are found to provide good clinical
results. A retrospective review of SHR revisions between 2007 and 2012
was presented, and the type of revision and aetiologies were recorded.
There were 55 SHR revisions, of which 27 were in women. At a mean
follow-up of 2.3 years (0.72 to 6.4), the mean post-operative Harris
hip score (HHS) was 94.8 (66 to 100). Overall 23 were revised for mechanical
reasons, nine for impingement, 13 for metallosis, nine for unexplained
pain and one for sepsis. Of the type of revision surgery performed,
14 were femoral-only revisions; four were acetabular-only revisions,
and 37 were complete revisions. We did not find that clinical scores were significantly different
between gender or different types of revisions. However, the mean
post-operative HHS was significantly lower in patients revised for
unexplained pain compared with patients revised for mechanical reasons
(86.9 (66 to 100) Based on the overall clinical results, we believe that revision
of SHR can have good or excellent results and warrants a continued
use of the procedure in selected patients. Close monitoring of these
patients facilitates early intervention, as we believe that tissue
damage may be related to the duration of an ongoing problem. There
should be a low threshold to revise a surface replacement if there
is component malposition, rising metal ion levels, or evidence of
soft-tissue abnormalities. Cite this article:
We undertook a retrospective cohort study to
determine clinical outcomes following the revision of metal-on-metal (MoM)
hip replacements for adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD), and
to identify predictors of time to revision and outcomes following
revision. Between 1998 and 2012 a total of 64 MoM hips (mean age
at revision of 57.8 years; 46 (72%) female; 46 (72%) hip resurfacings
and 18 (28%) total hip replacements) were revised for ARMD at one specialist
centre. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1.0 to 14.6) from revision
for ARMD there were 13 hips (20.3%) with post-operative complications
and eight (12.5%) requiring re-revision. The Kaplan–Meier five-year survival rate for ARMD revision was
87.9% (95% confidence interval 78.9 to 98.0; 19 hips at risk). Excluding
re-revisions, the median absolute Oxford hip score (OHS) following
ARMD revision using the percentage method (0% best outcome and 100%
worst outcome) was 18.8% (interquartile range (IQR) 7.8% to 48.3%),
which is equivalent to 39/48 (IQR 24.8/48 to 44.3/48) when using
the modified OHS. Histopathological response did not affect time
to revision for ARMD (p = 0.334) or the subsequent risk of re-revision
(p = 0.879). Similarly, the presence or absence of a contralateral
MoM hip bearing did not affect time to revision for ARMD (p = 0.066)
or the subsequent risk of re-revision (p = 0.178). Patients revised to MoM bearings had higher rates of re-revision
(five of 16 MoM hips re-revised; p = 0.046), but those not requiring
re-revision had good functional results (median absolute OHS 14.6%
or 41.0/48). Short-term morbidity following revision for ARMD was
comparable with previous reports. Caution should be exercised when choosing
bearing surfaces for ARMD revisions. Cite this article:
In this paper, we will consider the current role
of metal-on-metal bearings by looking at three subtypes of MoM hip
arthroplasty separately: Hip resurfacing, large head (>
36 mm) MoM
THA and MoM THA with traditional femoral head sizes.
Plasma levels of cobalt and chromium ions and
Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS)-MRI scans were performed
on patients with 209 consecutive, unilateral, symptomatic metal-on-metal
(MoM) hip arthroplasties. There was wide variation in plasma cobalt
and chromium levels, and MARS-MRI scans were positive for adverse reaction
to metal debris (ARMD) in 84 hips (40%). There was a significant
difference in the median plasma cobalt and chromium levels between
those with positive and negative MARS-MRI scans (p <
0.001).
Compared with MARS-MRI as the potential reference standard for the
diagnosis of ARMD, the sensitivity of metal ion analysis for cobalt
or chromium with a cut-off of >
7 µg/l was 57%. The specificity was
65%, positive predictive value was 52% and the negative predictive
value was 69% in symptomatic patients. A lowered threshold of >
3.5 µg/l for cobalt and chromium ion levels improved the sensitivity
and negative predictive value to 86% and 74% but at the expense
of specificity (27%) and positive predictive value (44%). Metal ion analysis is not recommended as a sole indirect screening
test in the surveillance of symptomatic patients with a MoM arthroplasty.
The investigating clinicians should have a low threshold for obtaining
cross-sectional imaging in these patients, even in the presence
of low plasma metal ion levels.
Lately, concerns have arisen following the use of large metal-on-metal bearings in hip replacements owing to reports of catastrophic soft-tissue reactions resulting in implant failure and associated complications. This review examines the literature and contemporary presentations on current clinical dilemmas in metal-on-metal hip replacement.
